TL;DR

I was really starting to think I was the only one. Gender neutral and as a reference to an abstract/unknown individual. The only change here is that it is also used for a known individual, which does sound strange at first, but is definitely worth getting used to. The key (and part of the strangeness) is that some…

This is even more ridiculous advice than the “Don’t Store Food Outdoors, Even if You Lose Power During the Winter” article. Kevin Williams clearly doesn’t understand cars enough to be writing about them.

This is ridiculous advice.

Amen. Thank you for this.

This. Is. Brilliant.

Discovering that this headline works with almost every picture on the Lifehacker main page:

Discovering that this headline works with almost every picture on the Lifehacker main page:

This is always the correct response.

It’s exactly what they’re talking about. In the example given, it’s somebody adding to the conversation and wanting to circle the relevant people involved. This is literally how people were intended to interact on Twitter. What they’re NOT talking about (and what would indeed be a dick move) is somebody shit-talking…

@samblum is wrong.

100%. Talk about cowardice. This is an outcry from people who want to talk shit and not have to own up to it.

But, some people called him the tased cowboy...

So, you’re writing an opinion piece about an article from a different publication, about an interview from another different publication that wrote a brief summary with a couple of blurbs out of an interview that is currently only available in print?

Well, since all of those are made up bullshit, and the only presidents that have done ACTUAL egregious acts are from the GOP...

That’s exactly it – people shouldn’t be fulfilled by “working”, they should be doing fulfilling work.

Preach. Nobody is going to look back at their life on their death bed and say “if only I had worked a little bit more...”

And now you’re doubling-down on the same line. We see you. You weren’t misunderstood. We’ve now gotten three doses of your garbage. It’s time for you to go find a more receptive audience. Go log in to your Parler account.

Well, I can’t speak to the point you were *trying* to make, but I can tell you the point that came across was “it’s amusing that all of you people here think that the Proud Boys are the bad guys, when in actuality BLM are the bad guys.” Once again, however, your framing of good guys and bad guys in quotes is pretty…

While a few of the details here are wrong, for the most part, these things happened and are indefensible. Appropriate charges should be brought against all people involved. This, however, doesn’t mean that A) any more than a small number of people were involved in these incidents, B) that actions taken by other BLM…

What’s fake is the equivalency of what the protesters in the videos are doing with what this article is reporting that the Proud Boys have done.