Agreed. In another comment, she says that the reason they don’t have a housekeeper is because the husband freaks out if anyone moves his stuff.
Agreed. In another comment, she says that the reason they don’t have a housekeeper is because the husband freaks out if anyone moves his stuff.
She also changed her story...first it was THE LITTER BOX IS CLEAN ALL THE TIME then it was IT’S NOT CLEAN CAUSE HUSBAND IS A SELFISH JACKASS. So... which is it?
I don’t want to pile on this lady, but I just gotta say: if asking her husband to clean the litter box while she’s freaking pregnant elicits anything other than “of course dear”, let alone a fight, then there are problems. She can’t do it, it needs to be done, he’s the only other person available. This does not bode…
Froggyfriendly, we are not hating on you- or at least most if us aren’t-but most of us are women and probably mothers and we know that if you think you can’t get on top of this cleaning situation now, it will be twice as bad when you’re taking care of a baby and cleaning up while trying to also keep it safe. Being…
Which calls were bullshit? The harassment calls that she doesn’t explain, or the one where a court-mandated reporter called CPS because she didn’t like the way her boyfriend reprimanded her child?
Wait, her cat has been peeing in the sink because no one will clean the litter box and she’s trying to make us seem like we’re the monsters for pointing out that urine isn’t clean? Gah, if you don’t want the responsibility of a pet, don’t get one!
WTF?! No one has said that you need to kill your cat! Also, you stated in a previous comment that the reason your cat does this is because your husband refuses to clean the litterbox while you’re pregnant.
Yeah, nurses are mandated reporters. If they called CPS it was because there was evidence of abuse.
yes, getting a degree in a specialized and advanced academic field and knowing how to use fucking lysol wipes is the exact same thing. you’re a genius.
What’s worse is that she doesn’t seem to get that the scenario was likely more severe than she describes. To her, she’s just a victim.
When I read
Right. And there appears to be a lot of missing information in the story as well. SO I am going to guess there was other action before removal but mom conveniently forgot that bit. (like, as other posters have pointed out, no judge would ever tell someone to plead guilty, so there is a lot of side eye going on here)
Did you miss the part where there had already been several investigations BEFORE they took the children away? They didn’t just jump to removal.
I remember that NYT story! And you’re exactly right: that bias does exist, I’ve seen it. But these are NOT the stories they should be choosing to showcase that bias.
Exactly. Messy is a pile of clothes on the floor or toys not put away. Dirty (weeks old) dishes, animal waste, and literal garbage everywhere...that’s beyond messy.
There is definitely a line between messy and hazardous. It’s not totally clear from the story how messy the house is... It says that cps came in and saw garbage and flies. Was the garbage stacks of old newspapers laying around or was it rotting food? Was it bagged up and contained properly or was it strewn about? Were…
The NYT had a fantastic story about CPS and their “Jane Crow” bias against poor minority mothers. That story did a good job of finding black women who had their kids taken away for things like having a little pot on them when they are with their kids or a little kid getting outside on their own-things that happen all…
No thanks, I’m good.
You know what? I’m perfectly fine with the fact that people who have been convicted of neglect can’t get jobs caring for children and the elderly.