I know, hence why I said they were for the C6. I used them as a benchmark since I couldn’t find the part number for the C7 carbon ceramics.

Engine performance modifications amount to about $7K. For an ~80hp bump. That’s not bad I guess.... Meh

Depends on a number of factors: IMS/non-IMS years, PDK vs manual, Base vs S vs special edition, etc.

They actually depreciate at an average rate.

Well, there are all sorts of carbon ceramic rotors, unsurprisingly. No clue how good the GM rotors are. That would take some research.

Almost 1,300 bucks for replacements for the C6 carbon ceramic rotors:

Stock engine is a 4age. A pretty decent engine with somewhat of an aftermarket. It’s relatively small, but likes to rev and people have made decent power with them.

Here’s a review of the FX16:

If you want to have a serious conversation, then lets have at it.

I called you a child once. Again, excellent reading skills. And thank you for reaffirming that statement with your superb reply.

Tell me about it. I regularly go between Dunwoody and downtown Atlanta. Using 400 and 85 already sucked and now I’ll have to go around and use 285. Boo, I say. Booo.

Just go around the perimeter. It will add a little time, but not much.

Guess I need to find a different way to get to work in the morning

I back tracked somewhat and said “possibly.” I didn’t realize that possibly was a direct contradiction of no.

What? No angry eyes? Feel like I see those things everywhere:

Clever and innovative are not the same thing. Innovative implies that it is new or original.

And of course it’s been done. Minus the Dakar factor:

Dakar Hilux. Plenty of room inside. Go anywhere. Mount something deadly in the bed.

Easiest way to go about it would be to just start with the most ideal platform.

It’s not a new method, idea, or product. It’s an existing method, idea, product, that has been put into a production vehicle.