anthrapologies! to my eyes for having seen this tripe.

Because a humanoid character in the form of a young adult male is more relatable to the real life of a teenager than giant robo-aliens who come crashing through the sky.

It's different when you judge someone on a choice, versus their inherent identity.

It's not usually the underage teens who are punished (legally). And when it's an 18 year old having a life ruined b/c the other is 16/17, then that is also stupid.

Shouldn't it be Babs' job to introduce the important figures to the ignorant? That alone would make Merkel a shoe in.

Are you over the age of consent in your area?

I also support an IUD if you're looking for more BC options.

Then, they would have to planet for redvision of instruments.

According to a source that may work for a super secret spy agency that loses briefcases in cars, having an affair is no big deal to an agency. It needs to be cleared with the higher authorities of super spydom, and the affair participant should be vetted. But otherwise, they have no moral qualms with it.

It's callous of me to be concerned over the long term effects that her non-action will have on her children? My family ?

But, there is that 10 year window you give, which may factor into her decision making process. I recognize that certain genetic markers behave fully independently of external effects, but there are others that do not (however small the influence). And I assume at the time of her genetic diagnosis, she was given the…

The first two paragraphs are written to be directly compared. Hence, the last statement of P1 "intensive and invasive surgery" is to be compared directly to P2's "ease of the operation". Methodology was briefly mentioned. Just not as explicitly as you would have liked it.

Reconstruction is a whole other can of worms that oophor/hysterectomies don't have to deal with. And that reconstructions impact the outcome of a prophylactic DM when undertaken simultaneously or before healing has completed. I recognize the complications for any surgery can be horrendous, even surgeries that are…

Actually, I said "the ease of the operation". Which does not equal "the operation is easy to have or deal with". It means "the operation is easy to perform". And from a surgical and physiological standpoint, it is. I made no comment about you comparing surgeries. I clarified that the comparison was more my point.

It's physiologically easier than having your uterus, ovaries, cervix and fallopian tubes removed. Which was more my point.

I'm sorry to hear of your loss.

My eldest sister had her reproductive organs removed at 47 due to her probability of getting lady-bits cancer and the severe medical problems she was having at the start of her menopause. She'd had her kids and was all "nah-uh" to the dying. She was smart to have an intensive and invasive surgery.