It won't.

Yeah, well as you might expect, media reporting is sensationalist and shit. The wiki page has a breakdown of how difficult it actually is by age:

http://humrep.oxfordjournals.org/content/27/5/1375.short

The point is that it's getting on for being too late by the time you reach your 30s. Mockery and shitty ad campaigns obviously aren't the solution but that doesn't mean there isn't potentially a problem.

Beat me to it. Do as I say, not as I do...

Although it is a patronising method, people generally aren't aware of how rapidly fertility declines with age (particularly in women):

"Navarro appears, in many ways, to be the very best sort of representative her party has to offer — a fiscal hardliner who is sensible about basic truths and rights."

Sociology is less exact I think, because it deals with things that are marginally less predictable. So probably because it's about people.

I'm a scientist (in training) who agrees.

Sociology is a science too. I'm not sure you get too many regressive sociologists.

Yeah, I know, it was a way to identify with a group of voters it was becoming painfully obvious were not going to benefit from your economic policies. But I'm pretty sure some of them are Christian enough that they'd care what Jesus thought.

The Democrats are less overt about all their actions being in the name of god.

It would also be better if Jesus came back and explained to the Republican Party the error of their ways. We'd be here all year if we talked about how great it would be if things that never-ever will happen actually did happen.

That'd be a bit like trying to bail out the Titanic with a teacup. Better to just hop onto a lifeboat and get the fuck out of there.

You are allowed to have those priorities but if your priorities are "ME! ME! ME! ME!", then everyone else is allowed to think you're a tool.

http://people.hnl.bcm.tmc.edu/jli/reference/282.pdf

It's nothing like a monarchy. North Korea is more like a monarchy.

I've heard one of my friends say it before but that's as much as I can contribute. There is at least one other.

Isn't that largely due to its omission of the female pronoun? "You shalt not lie with a man as you lie with a woman" is proscribing male homosexuality because the bible assumes a male reader, right? Isn't that just do with translation (I don't know what the original Hebrew pronouns/words would be) and semantics rather…

Does nobody in that bloody newsroom have a soul?