The good news won’t stop!!!

It is unsolvable for Hillary because Bill is not talking about what she would do as president, but what he did and now defending it. We were up against crime at the time. Lots of it. But the solution ended up exacerbating the actual problem.

You know how rapidly you age when you live in the White House? I think, spiritually, Bill forgot to leave in 2000 and he’s been rapidly aging ever since.

Interestingly, people who undergo open-heart surgery often have odd personality changes afterward. I wonder if this is part of the reason for the “new” Bill Clinton?

i agree with this theory, i’m on a low fat diet and am miserable. what i wouldn’t give for a 5 guys burger and fries right now

Nope. Bill is far more interested in protecting his record than her winning. And the consequences of that poorly thought out and knee jerk reaction Crime Bill has become a serious issue in this campaign. That makes the tens of thousands of young black men in prison for minor offenses a problem that Bill caused. Bill…

Hillary would be better served if Bill were doing the late night show circuit. He’s very charismatic, and I get the sense he’d be able to let loose in a way Hillary doesn’t (although, why she necessarily *has* to baffles me, seriousness isn’t necessarily a bad quality in a president).

hahahaha i was a suburban tween/teen so like...he played the saxophone man!

HE TOLD TED KENNEDY BARACK OBAMA SHOULD BE “FETCHING THEIR COFFEE”

Actual Gchat I just had with my GF:

I absolutely thought this in 2008 as a result of some of his extremely stupid statements.

lol no

roll tide to that gif

i pray for the state of your notifications in about 10 minutes

Bill...just..sigh..

That’s not true. These big ticket fundraisers are an end run around campaign finance laws to get more money to Mrs. Clinton’s campaign. It’s akin to money laundering. The DNC/DCCC/DSCC don’t care about down ballot races. They have not even bothered to field candidates for a lot of congressional seats. In other cases,…

Interesting, I’m of the opposite opinion. I think a small portion of the federal budget should be set aside for presidential elections and private donations disallowed so influence cannot be overtly purchased. I agree that money isn’t innately evil, but I also have to acknowledge it holds influence over people.

I read an interesting political science study recently that one of the reasons the US may have better than average female participation in elected office (and let’s all pause to feel some sads that our piss poor 20% congressional seats is better than average) may be precisely because we have large female focused super…

Here you go, rude asshat.

What about all the other future daughters in the United States who can’t be whatever they want to be because they never had the economic safety net to take the risks and spend the time to do so?