i’m talking about in general not about what jenny knows.

yeah ive been looking at the proof and it says that you’re full of shit. so if your head wasn’t up your ass, you see it.

you need to put all of your points in one comment. you’ve got 4 or 5 long ass comments. this is ridiculous.

no i didn’t and yes you did. you started with at least a dozen buildings and then claimed there were so much more which is inaccurate since the film didn’t show than many buildings being destroyed by the ship. it was clearly less than 12.

Look at the quote again. You conveniently missed when they “star child”. Focus again on the child part and how it clearly Refers to Jesus which surprisingly unsurprisingly you completely ignored it again. You’ve been presented with a truthful claim but you’d rather stick your head in the sand.

And you’re still trying to pin false accusations about shit I didn’t do. That’s even more amusing.

It’s amazing how you Conveniently left out the part where the word el means God in Judaism. Kal El meaning child of God which was right there in the quotes. But no continue ignoring the clear evidence. Yeah, wouldn’t want to prove yourself wrong. Right? Oh yeah riiiiight it’s “worse”. Keep up that narrative of yours.

the people saw a glowing ship crash into the world engine. its easy to assume its alien meaning its related to superman and the fact that the world engine miraculously stops when then he arrives means he had something to do with it. and seeing him carry lois lane and land her down shows him saving someone. add those…

i’m not quibbling at all. i admitted i was wrong about the one building but no way is it more than 8. you went from a dozen to more than a dozen when the movie doesn’t show anything resembling such a number. your estimate is not conservative. its exaggerated.

How about you actually put the link in the search bar and you’ll get all that you’re looking for? The article made part of my point before derailing off subject. The quote didn’t contradict my claim. All it showed was that the guy went off subject. Nowhere did i fail to differentiate between the two. And just because…

It’s hilarious how in the process trying to prove that I repeated something and that I'm wrong, you end up proving yourself wrong. You made yourself look like an idiot. You proved nothing wrong. Try again. 

Yes falsely accused, doofus.

Why should I quote it when it’s right there for you to read? Why can’t you out the link in the search bar and Google it. No the previous article supported some of my points. It just lost its way. I’m neither agreeing or disagreeing. I didn’t waste any time. You wasted out time when you could Have easily used the link.…

Well then that’s your problem. You asked for a source. You got one. You’re too Lazy to put the link in the search barn that’s your problem. And the last link didn’t really fall short of what I said. It was close but the author got carried away from the original idea. If you can't bother to do your end of it cause you…

here is the thing though zods fight with supes only brought down a couple of buildings. so it wouldn’t be a dozen buildings. it would be like 8 buildings. also i appreciate what you’re saying. thank you.

The link is there. Use it. If you’re too lazy to put it in the search bar, then that’s your problem.

you’re falsely accusing me of repetition but you yourself are repetitive and you’re saying its tied to my repetition. how do you not see how ridiculous and hypocritical that is ? you are seriously scrapping the bottom of the barrel. i redirect a single ridiculous comment that you made back at you to show you how…

Yet here you are doing the same thing where you are being repetitive and then accusing me of being repetitive. Do you not realize how ridiculously hypocritical that is? Smh

That's mighty hypocritical of you since you keep repeating the same lazy troll attempt. 

and also i was talking about the reactions to the people in 9/11 cause thats what you were talking about.