you obviously didn’t. you claimed that i was apologizing for the “pornographic” destruction of metropolis when that was bullshit. i never did. you’re trying to apologize for the lack of destruction and tension in superman 2 by claiming that it had internal conflicts while you deny the internal conflicts in man of…

Neither. They may have gone through the store which I will admit. I didn’t remember that part. But the thing that explodes was the gas station not the store. And there weren’t any people in the station and we don’t see any deaths. And it was only the gas station that exploded not the store.

And you're still trollimg. Lazily. 

https://www.listland.com/10-reasons-superman-is-jesus-christ/

Except people didn’t know the plot. The trailers showed it from the perspective of batman. We were seeing batmans perspective. No supermans. The main point of the trailer was their conflict. 

Thanks but still try working harder on your trolling cause they’re lazy attempts. One day someone will pat you on your head for attempting to troll well.

I didn’t deny things at all. While you have making things up and twsiting things to fit your narrative. I never said the farm was in the middle of town. I said the farm was in Smallville.

You’re trying to Make the claim And the defence contradictory when theyre not cause at the end of the day, Jonathan Kent was proven right

Not a dead link. Try it again. 

I didn’t. I was talking about the destruction in superman 2 not Mos. So your claim is completely inaccurate and ridiculous. You completely misunderstood what I was talking about. I was talking about superman 2 not Mos. Check again. So no I wasn’t apologizing. My statements arent contradictory.

It’s not head Canon. It’s what’s shown in the films. It showed a build up towards hope. The bvs movie was not about whether he wants to be a symbol of hope or not. It was about whether what he was doing was having a positive or a negative impact and it was about the world realizing that he wasn’t a God. He was just a…

I’m not in any way. He can protect his mother and those people without using his powers and exposing himself. That’s not the case for his dad as his dad was trapped under a car n the middle of a tornado. It was not about revealing his powers. It was about giving him More time to Be ready to bear the weight of the…

Really twisting what I’m saying. They were already in populated areas. So the idea that he hurled anykne into populated areas makes no sense. Also he can lure then away as well. They’re not mutually exclusive. He didn’t got through a power plant. He went through a silo which are empty.

http://www1.cbn.com/inspirationalteaching/superman%27s-messianic-message

Who don't you go work on your trolling? 

Not really it’s not. Not even close to being superficial. Superman did grow. He was on a lost path at the beginning of the film. He finds his purpose and his true identity and starts to become more confident as he accepts both of his identity. He becomes more accepting of himself and the world around him and less…

Troll

No it's hard to find. 

I did that’s why I made that statement. There is nothing that points to the idea that that clarks ship crash landed in the Kent farm. We saw it crash land in a field. The Kent farm Was shown in the film When he takes zod, to be close to a power plant and the town. It wasn’t many miles away. He doesn’t unnecessarily…

No that’s factually correct. Just because he says “there is more at stake here than just our lives” doesn’t mean he is saying he should have let them die. Not even close. He was telling him. About the risks of exposing himself. The tornado scene doesn’t support that at all. In the tornado scene, Jonathan gives him the…