That guy’s tire pressures were spot on!
Demon-Xanth knows how to operate a street.
demon-xanth
Tongue weight still has a vast chasm.
One is the BRM H16 engine that went into Formula 1 cars. The others are the A57 and a twin engine that went into Shermans.
Now playing
By comparison, the T815 break over angle appears to be about 85 degrees and has an approach and departure angle of “wall”
No clue, I never took it and paid off all my student loans more than a decade ago. If you got questions about IPC soldering exams, that’s my bag.
“Noobs.”--Chrysler A57 engineer
Now playing
Because this can’t be posted too often:
90-110PSI is the factory spec for compression, FWIW. The fact that they’re all similar leads me to suspect it’s a gauge or measurement issue and that you’re actually probably okay.
If the internet has taught me anything it’s this:
I’m planning on stripping my Corvair and doing the roll on rustoleum job soon. I really suck at painting so I’m hoping to drop it from 60mph/60 yard paint to 20mph/20 yard paint that actually slows down rust.
The Mustagea!
The digestive system often has to act as a refinery.
JUST LIKE MUSTANGS!
Falcon:
Producing 200W vs consuming 200W.
Their numbers are correct, however seem intentionally misleading. An engine producing 100kW of energy uses more than 100kW worth of fuel. With MPG, this is counted. The quoted number though does not count the conversion losses by the fleshy engine but instead only measure energy by the transmission input.
However what they measured was the output watts and not the input watts. They didn’t calculate how many watts the snickers bar had, they calculated how many watts the pedals received.
The problem with measuring efficiency like they did is that it’s the equivalent of saying an engine and drivetrain are 100% efficient. They’re ignoring all of the overhead associated with converting a plate of spaghetti to rotational energy.