Where’s “A Tale of Five Balloons” and “Where’s Plut-Oh yeah, this isn’t an israeli website sorry sorry sorry carry on.

Ooh ooh can this lead to “Franz Ferdinand, Suck My Cock”? 

Good thing they were willing to wait for it. 

for some reason it doesn’t seem to link to the scene from youtube?

I get what you’re saying about Scary Movie 3 but I also really like this scene so I dunno. Something about the way the aliens walk just makes it great, even if it can use a bit less dog humping.

Reel Big Fish’s “Our Live Album Is Better than Your Live Album” should be here. Even if ska is still considered not cool or whatever, ska live shows are amazing, and this album is just excatly what it says it is.

That being said, “Alive” definetly deserves that no. 1 spot. 

Batman: The Movie would like to have a word with you.

I didn’t miss it, but it seems to me that the general tone is “ refrain from bringing the kids to court, but if necessary for the case to go to court - do so”.

these are the next sentences of the quote you gave. Neither of them are proof that prosecutors act one way or the other, but if this is the guideline - it seems that the prosecutor in the Allen case dropped the ball. 

Unless i’m misreadind - doesn’t this just say they should not bring the child to testify in court while still taking the case itself to court?

Which is weak, right? Is this common behaviour for prosecutors? It goes against everything I know about them. Is there more evidence of cases against pedophiles that got shut down because they could harm the kids psychologically? 

too

So it’s based on the 90s, called “Everything Sucks!” and yet fails to put Reel Big Fish in its trailer. I’m stumped. 

You seem to have crossed the line into “pissed off and making arguments against things I haven’t said” so now would be a good place to stop. 

Okay. 

I think the general idea of what you’re saying was answered by me somewhere up this comment section. In short: Experts are great, but they’re not foolproof, especially in politics, especially in the middle east.  

Either I or you don’t fully understand what “moving the goalposts” means and at this point, i’m content to leave it that way.

Okay, so, this is why i don’t like to debate this online in a language i’m weaker at. I’ve no one to blame but myself but in a debate that most people require precise words, i’m not there yet (in written language, anyway).

1. Okay, yeah, but the actual moving of embassies will take some time, obviously. The US is not the only one to recognize Jerusalem as the capital was my point.

2. Okay, but that was not really a “goalpost” of mine - more a random thought. 

One could say that the leverage Is the recognition. No one in Israel was pouncing about trying to get the USAs approval, but now that they are “on their side”, they will have to take their propistions more seriously.

I agree on the other part, but seeing as how the responses went, I don’t think that would of have…