or claimed that there was a bridge connecting Gaza and the west bank.

I bet those cheerleaders are in much worse condition now than this car at the same age. 

Cycling’s doping rules are overly restrictive?

I bet these comments will be reasonable, nuanced and measured!

It’s what happens simultaneously just before and just after something is “half-baked and overcooked.”

Obscure movies can totally be better than popular ones. But when you pick only (or close to it) obscure movies to populate your lists, you’re rather likely to be a pretentious git.

Even then, drawing back on my magazine editor days, I’d say that one doesn’t “lumber through a morass” while either “stunned or constrained.” Also, which is it? Even when you take the 3rd “or” out of the original phrase there, it still has that tone of someone swinging around hoping to land on an opinion.

The kind of dudes (for the most part) who are going to be pissed about this and comment angrily not his article DGAF about how frightened women and POC are. That’s how they like us. At a minimum, they’d rather shut their ears and not listen and so thus will just shout over us with stuff like NOT ALL MEN and BEING A…

It also sounds he wanted to have a negative hot take, but didn’t actually have any substance to base that negative hot take on, so he used big words and absurdly complex sentences to try to distract readers into thinking he was saying something really smart.

They’re discriminated against all the time. They all live in their parents basements, pushing the BMIs to max levels, but don’t have super hot girlfriends. They should have super hot girlfriends without having to do anything. Girls should just fall at their feet for them.

And how in the world can something be both half-baked and overcooked at the same time? At the very least it seems the writer knows a thing or two about being half-baked.

wait hold up I thought you just googled a picture of “old hipster” but this is ACTUALLY THE JOURNALIST YOU GUYS. yikes.

Their feelings are awfully tender for someone literally never discriminated against in a systemic way.

Why do we need to be so very concerned about their feelings? Why not just come out and call them white supremacists? Even simple racist isn’t strong enough. They want someone who calls it like it is? Then call them that.

The alt-right (neo-nazis) are triggered man-babies that need a safe space from dealing with reality.

There was no mansplaining, patriarchy, or manthreading mentions in this article though, so maybe it will be ok?

Of course you haven’t heard of them. You’ve never heard of your lovable neighborhood hipster’s favorite vinyl, either.

I’m honestly confused as to what is so hard about calling them “racists.” That is what they are and tiptoeing around it is a little odd.

How coincidental, Triple H will be our bond rating after the Trump Presidency.

Would I have said something like that at 18? Sure, probably. Does that mean I was a piece of shit at 18? Oh, absolutely.