I'm not a Colts fan, even though I eat like one.

Let's all agree, right now, that Adam Scott is a cinch to star in the Robyn Hitchcock biopic. Otherwise it's going to bother me for years. Years.

Nice — I didn't see that coming. Hat doffed to you, sir or madam.

Exactly. She's totally miscast. Although I find her oddly easy to ignore in that role.

The Good Shepherd is a criminally underrated film. (Because it's so slow.) In all seriousness, it's worth a half-decade of decent De Niro performances right there.

You've clearly got more to share on this topic. Let it all out. We're all friends here.

Very interestingly and thoughtfully put.

Christ, I thought you were kidding.

I guessing because the judge in question isn't a man.

+1 verification of where the beef likely is

All right, @SamBarge, your question might be rhetorical, but you deserve a serious response to it anyway. Here are attitudes I would describe as philistinism, specifically in film:

Misguided moral indignation, okay — although the entire internet does kind of run on that stuff. It's the proudly proffered philistinism that gets me. As though it's a virtue.

Well, folks may tell you you're a bad feminist because of this, but you're totally okay with me. Plus, I need the eggs.

To be clear, "swearing off" Woody Allen means swearing off: Take the Money and Run, Sleeper, Bananas, Love and Death, Annie Hall, Manhattan, Zelig, The Purple Rose of Cairo, Hannah and Her Sisters, Crimes and Misdemeanors, Husbands and Wives, and Bullets Over Broadway, among many other films. Because you consider it…

I've always wondered why the latter movie got made, when the earlier one needs absolutely no elaboration. Theories?

Do you draw any conclusions from this experience?

Promoted for making an outstandingly thoughtful and substantive contribution.

No one wants to see less than the best possible athletes play, regardless of the sport.

Wow. I did not see that one coming.

+1