Explore our other sites
  • jalopnik
  • kotaku
  • quartz
  • theroot
  • theinventory
    danthropomorphism
    Dan
    danthropomorphism

    Your reasoning is confusing to me. For example, what are you trying to say here:

    Re: The Kid Who Would Be King and Joe Cornish: “Just coming!”

    Yes, I’d like to know how strong a feeling has to be before it births a refund. Perhaps it would have required belligerence on her part or maybe if she didn’t deign to drink with some of the fans?

    We can’t stop talking about “healthy body.”

    Haowh Ruu...

    S to the P to the A to the AWWWWWN S to the P to the A to the AWWWWN

    Laura, kudos to your continuing swole-praise. Also, nice “flip ya” reference in last week’s recap.

    Richard Matt’s loving renditions of Clinton and Bush show he possessed a much needed trait in modern America—bipartisanism! We need more bipartisan murderers in today’s toxic political environment.

    I was also obsessed with the word Dannemora for a while and was surprised to learn it has origins in northern Europe although I too think the series should have been set in Australia!

    I’ve unfortunately been exposed to some of his “Carpool Karaoke” segments where he always does this really annoying thing with his hand when he sings poorly. It’s that diva-hand gesture where you face the palm out, kind of like Beyonce’s Single Ladies hand turning thing. Anyway, it’s really bad just like him.

    Yes, really bad. When the writer’s realize they’ve written themselves into corners and think a fight scene will be quirky enough to make everyone forget how empty a show it is.

    Nice try, dood.

    Thanks Claude, I can agree with you on this. And yeah, I’m being harsh. I did like Parks and Rec more. as well It’s just...when you bring omnipotent beings and models of the universe and morality (e.g. Supermen), you’re probably biting off more than you can chew (you know, unless you’re Alan Moore or something and

    I can agree to that point being a step in a sensible direction, but I’m mostly focusing on you know, the parts everyone here is talking about. The digging on this, the snapping, the dancing.

    I can admit that I may have missed a plot point in my frustration, and I admit I’m coming off a bit too vicious. And I’m really not claiming to be particularly well-versed in ethics—but that’s the problem. If someone like me, with an admittedly rudimentary view of the moral philosophy landscape can see Chidi’s

    Now dig on this: Didn’t Raimi (or someone of similar involvement) claim this in an interview? I mean this with minimal suspicion: nice shilling. But this is still a highly suspect attempt to explain away an objectively embarrassing scene by saying it was “on purpose.” Of course every character and viewer understands

    [RANT alt=”Apologies in advance, I swear I’m not a dick usually”]

    I can’t wait to see him say, “I need plaaaasmaaaaaaa.”

    Parnassus for the win(best sketch of the night)!

    Anyone else watched this? Mostly agree with IV as usual, but I would probably grade it lower. It’s the cinematic equivalent of a connect-the-dots activity book with loosely fleshed out characters and tons of weird writing and nonsensical criticism (life is a narrator? what? unreliable narrators have almost never been