How could he say that they were all okay? He just assumed that, then reported it.

Wait, you hate bees? Sensitive much?

You are why American car companies go for wiz-bang instead of reliability. Toyota uses old tech for one reason, and one reason only. Reliability. I’ve designed both Toyota and Chrysler auto components.

If you think they are gonna sell that thing... hahahaha

What you are suggesting is only possible with computer controlled flight surfaces. Because deflection force is a function of aircraft speed, one control surface limit will not suffice. Use your head, please. Everything you are saying is wrong.

No, I think you are the one who are nuts. You think this thing can only do 250 mph? That statistic if for level flight, genius. It can go much faster in a dive. He is something to remember, Einstein. All aircraft can break up from ‘turning to fast.’ All of them. All of them are capable of getting too fast in a dive,…

I beg to differ. I would speculate that most inflight breakups are a result of spatial disorientation, which results in tighter and tighter spirals (and thus G forces). One of two things happen. You hit the ground, or you break up from the ever increasing G forces. Its a terrifying end, because in the last few seconds…

1980s superbikes like Honda’s v45 interceptor do sub 12 second 1/4 miles, and they feel like rockets to me.

Some real stunners on this list, although I’ve always thought the Plymouth was ugly. I’m gonna say a Karmann Ghia deserves to be here, because at least it was affordable.

You should buy better tires if you are losing traction as they wear. 

Depends on what you call ‘soon’. My daily driver is a 2012 model year, atm. No problem finding parts for it, either.

In case you haven’t caught on yet, the man is what us old guys call a blow hard. He tells a lot of tall tales.

My man, I’ve got some bad news for you. Elon’s flying water tower will never make it to Mars.

Yea, I don’t think ‘slick tires’ is what caused that. In fact, quite the opposite.

Flying radio control aircraft is not the same as flying an airplane. It’s not even in the same ballpark.

I think you are just making stuff up. What are your sources?

Yea, its true. It is still true. American manufacturers still use a different design philosophy. As it was described to me when i was a newb in automotive design, Chrysler customers look for gadgets. Toyota customers look for reliability, so don’t do anything risky.

At my last job, I was just shy of tens years. Had gone through at least 5 house-cleaning layoffs. Eventually I pissed off the prick who was my supervisor, and got laid off. I was working late when they called me in. They had to wait because I was running a design review. I said to myself, I’m either getting canned, or…

Its blurry, and I can’t see any detail. Why am I not surprised?

Its because conservatives run these companies. They all live in a bubble.