The McDaniel Militia Act

It’s a six second video, he couldn’t have tried it one more time? Him stumbling over words does make your comparison that much more accurate though.

Whoa, there are good autocorrects on all phones. I think we need to hear your phone’s side of things before we can decide who is right here.

You can eat at a table saw (and quickly cut your steak!), the best you can do with a hand saw it use it as a plate. This suggestion was for multitasking.

Mmmm. I had always thought curry and eggs would be weird, not sure why, but then my parent’s brought back a bottle of curry mango hot sauce from the US Virgin Islands and now I won’t eat eggs without it. A breakfast samosa would be amazing.

If she added samosas to the menu, this would be the perfect food truck with a perfect name, Sosa’s Samosas & Mimosas.

There are an average of 43 words per sentence in this article with the longest sentence ringing in at 67 words. (This is counting hyphenated words as one.) Yeah, I’d say that’s too long!

DeSeah has always struggled against the press.

Yup:

Right? God forbid any of the poors sully the gaming experience. I’m shocked that they think they even deserve to play video games, so rude.

Neat. I wanted to see if you would ever come off the faux superiority act where you get to pretend that you are better or smarter than someone over a single internet comment, but I don’t have the patience to ride it out with you. Your dedication is impressive and it looks like you’ve bested me yet again. You can pick…

Nice. Did that feel good? Are you proud of yourself? Also, “conjure” is above my reading level, could you use a simpler word?

The slippery slope is in requiring lenders to internalize the risk of the borrower. Where does that stop and what risks and levels of risk would qualify? Do auto lenders need to take on the risk of the pollution caused by those vehicles? Does a lender funding the construction of a barn for a dairy farm need to…

I agree in theory that participating in something that will cause harm to other should result in some kind of liability, but my issue is where does that stop?

Oh but I’m really enjoying the Superior Internet Person shtick you have going! If you could insult my intelligence just one more time, I’d feel a lot better.

I’m not sure how you apply that to pipelines. The developer/operator of the pipeline would be liable because they caused it regardless of whether they get a phase 1 to be an ‘innocent landowner’ under CERCLA but the lender would simply get a phase 1 EA before the pipeline is built and not participate in the…

Jesus christ, yeah, the analogy was bad, see my responses to others here.

Yeah, there is, but you just hand waved it away by saying that slippery slope arguments are almost always bullshit without actually engaging. Unless the lender was in a joint venture with the builder/operator or exerted control over the project, why should they accept the risk of non-payment of their loan and the risk…

Yeah, bad analogy I get it. I don’t have time to fully respond to everyone just telling me that my analogy is bad so my response to Sedaris will have to do: https://splinternews.com/1833243908

I appreciate the actual response from you. My bad analogy aside, I have an issue with this: “if a bank reasonably should have known they were funding something harmful.” How do you quantify this? How do we start drawing lines on what is immoral or harmful and do we balance that with the benefit created by something…