daffydilly
DaffyDilly
daffydilly

This guy’s argument sounds like this encounter I had on a playground as a kid. Other kid hits me in the shoulder. I hit him back in the shoulder. He hits me again, and then proclaims “Now we’re even!”

Goddam you guys. We had a friend over there with a bunch of her students. They were at the event, but they are okay. Scared the crap out of me while I sat and waited for a response.

I hope he's got the stones to cancel a Syracuse/UNC game

Doesn’t seem fair to punish Duke over this, as they aren’t representative of the greater N.C. that passed HB2. Anyone who has ever known or met an alum can attest to the fact that they accept insufferable privileged assholes of all backgrounds.

I mean in the argument about why the insurance company should or shouldn’t have to satisfy the payouts, their argument of “we shouldn’t have to because Penn St knew about the abuse and did nothing to stop it” makes them right, and the fact that Penn State insisted they make the payouts even though Penn St was

I absolutely don’t blame the insurance company for this and I think insurance companies are some of the biggest scam artists on the planet. But seriously, “we protected a kiddy diddler for two decades and his victims sued” really is in the realm of not the fucking insurance company’s problem. LIKE AT ALL. Penn State

It only makes a difference in pretty press photos. Otherwise if this detail bothers someone so much, they shouldn’t be driving.

This is actually a very common finding when a child-abuse case involves a prominent member of a community, especially if that community puts great value on whatever that individual does. There’s a rush to explain away accusations and victim shame those who are seen as trying to bring down the accused rather than

Stories like this convince me there are others involved, possibly a pedophile ring. Sandusky was enabled by so many, there has to be more abusers and victims.

General insurance against being sued is something you can get, and probably most things that have a decent shot at being sued get it. Think malpractice insurance, just more generally.

Jesus Christ Penn State. You really have to work hard to make an insurance company into a sympathetic figure.

I can only imagine what he did the to victim that got offered 5-6million compared to the sums of the rest. Also the 0-200,000 seems strange. Almost Schrodinger’s cat like where they could have been assaulted but we weren’t there to observe it.

It’s interesting, but I don’t see it making that big of a difference. How often do you look at or even see your seat belt latch out of the corner of your eye? You certainly don’t see it while sitting in the car, and I don’t even see mine getting in and out. Literally the only time I see it is if I’m staring directly

Tesla people are the weirdest people alive.

I honestly never even noticed that all seat belt release buttons were the same color and I've been driving for almost two decades.

I honestly couldn’t care less about red seat belt buttons nor would I notice or think it brings the rest of the interior down.

You guys are fucked in the head. If this makes a big difference to you I suggest seeking a therapist asap.

It means literally nothing unless you’re ogling photos of the interior.

While being in the car you’ll never see it.

In the deposition, McQueary claims that when he told Bradley about what he had seen, Bradley was not shocked.

They don’t CARE about the evidence.