dadwantedadoggotyoufoundjesusanda45
Steve_Buscemi's_Orthodontist
dadwantedadoggotyoufoundjesusanda45

Sounds like the Seahawks are getting ... skittleish.

Please o please tell me "coug'd it" has reached the point that it's now part of the popular vernacular and not just slang WSU fans use explain to their compatriots why they couldn't beat a JV high school team.

If that is truly your endgame (again, as much as I disagree with the premise behind it - i.e. I don't find video game journalism to be any more corrupt than any other sort of journalism - which isn't saying much) then you owe it to yourself and your movement to disavow and disown anyone who thinks doxxing, sexism,

Kotaku, as an example, lets you know when and where they are playing their tests.

As far as "How did they get their review copy?" - well, like 99% of other reviewers (take Jalopnik for example), they didn't buy theirs. It was given to them. What difference does that make? A shitty free game is no better than a shitty

But Kotaku has made feeding the trolls a cottage industry and you are helping them do that by deflecting the criticism onto random people who don't have the platform of a media company to accomplish what they want.

Horseshit.

With zero brains (I am an idiot) and nothing but gumption and a penchant for reading how to

You're not wrong. At all. And I get where you are coming from.

I would think it is apparent that if your company supports ads from X and you write reviews of X, that the need to disclose that info would be redundant.

"You didn't say that you accept ad money from Insomniac before you reviewed Sunset Overdrive, scum!"

"Bro, was the giant flashing Insomniac banner at the top of the

I'm pretty sure you're the first person to say that said post wasn't "inflammatory and ridiculous". So I'm not sure if you're serious ... or if I'm just too slow to understand sarcasm today.

I would, genuinely, love for some Pro-Gamergate person to explain exactly what they're demanding when they ask for "more transparency in gaming journalism" (because, after all, that's what this whole thing is, supposedly, about).

Maybe I'm dumb (probably), but I've been wracking my brain for days trying to figure out

I get the "if you don't like it, build it yourself / don't bully creatives" argument. However, it misses a couple of key points:

1) The creatives aren't doing this for free. Yes, they are artists - but they are artists working on products intended to reach a large target audience (more often than not). They aren't

Yannick - where can we download it?

I've gone into the game itself, marketplace, etc (xbox one) and can't find the option for this DLC.

However, you would have a problem with said female space marine being killed by other, possibly male space marines

Not at all. Take, for example, Gears of War 3. The multiplayer options gave you a plethora of people to choose from - male, female, white, black, hispanic, etc. I see no issue with that whatsoever.

GamerGate

I regret that one.

You're right. I fucked that one up.

Touche.

By the way, try playing Mass Effect series. You can be a lesbian alien killing female in that if you want.

Yeah, and do you remember the metric shitton of brobitching that arose because your character could be gay and how many people found it offensive and bullshit because "games weren't supposed to broach such topics"

Jesus Christ on a cracker.

Leigh Alexander wasn't talking about you. Hell, she wasn't talking about me (the cis-gendered heteroish white male in our current back and forth).

She was talking about the cesspool of self-obsessed child rapists that have come to dominate "gamer culture" - basement dwelling Hot Pocket

No, it doesn't. It really doesn't.

But you do whatever you need to keep your dreams of self-righteous objectivist me-first consumerist activism alive, buddy.

Meanwhile, those of us who aren't hurt that a woman allegedly had sex with more people than you have brain cells will just have to keep on truckin' through our