Waiting for commenters to drool over this while calling HD trucks overpowered, overpriced, and excessive in 3...2...1....

That appears to be a light-duty truck.

You’re welcome.

Is that Murilee chick back at jelopnic?

Can't just give Erik the space he needs? 

No, I think it’s just that Jalopnik seems to report primarily on the crashes and deaths.

Chevy made a Lexus RX and called it a Blazer.

I’ve heard all the arguments. I’m not climbing boulders, and off-roading is 1% of what I do with my Jeep anyway.

Fascinating. My (apparently incorrect) assumption would be that the vehicles would be symmetrical in their construction, so it shouldn’t matter which side hits. It’s crazy that they appear so clearly “built to the test”, which previously has always focused on the driver’s side.

And here’s what cars would look like if designers had evolved vision but not taste:

I didn’t read the article: the poster

I did this on a motorcycle once. Was following an early 2000s Mustang Cobra on my ‘93 CBR1000F in the early 2000's. Pulled up at a stoplight next to said Cobra, he rolls down his window and says “How’s it feel to lose to a Mustang?!”

This Jeep ad killed it

Okay, cool. Our goal was to give players a choice. It’s not perfect but we’re still working on it. Thanks for playing and keep an eye on the Facebook page for some news.

Why are you watching video ads? Those aren’t forced on you. Your choice, spend money, play the game, or watch video ads. You could spend $5 on multipliers and be set forever.

Zero cars have souls.

Hate to go all “person who equivocates in professional academic/research writing” on you, but it’s worth reading exactly what the researchers mean when they talk about “Group 2A”.

I think you’re looking for this: