crbrennan
Spaceknight
crbrennan

Unfortunately, it not only has to fly, it has to maintain a veto-override capability.

Only a Republican could cry oppression to the “first but co-equal” nature of their own importance.

Now playing

You had me expecting that to end with an Andrew Benintendi reference!

Whether it’s fair to players is not the issue. The system right now is still what it is.

So it’s March and the Whalers are only a game under .500 this season.  I’ll settle for that.

First sentence of the Constitution says “promote the general Welfare”.

Yeah. Her original tweet had a music notes emoji (probably not included when certain people quote it) and the song is not about a guy named Benjamin.

It’s not the same mistake twice. Even if I grant you that the first was a mistake (and I’m not convinced it was the mistake people are crying it is) the second one says “a powerful lobbying group”. Not some generic comment about money in politics you could stretch to be about a conspiracy theory.

It’s not just about who’s next in line.

The real question is whether there will be a vote called to override the veto. Mitch can uphold a veto all by himself.

“If there were an emergency in the sense that the president is describing, there would be a lot more consensus.

Maybe the question then is: how did that get out of the greys? Especially so quickly? (I happened to be here right as the article got posted and made my reply when there were only 8 responses.)

Look, I’m not going to defend his views, but you have to tell me how his post above is trolling.  Irrelevant?  Yes.  Troll?  Enlighten me, please.

The next time they publicly question Cohen, I want someone to ask “what did Pence know and when did he know it?”

I think the most damning thing is that ESPN.com doesn’t have a page for AAF.

Honest question: why just the racial faux pas?

This illustrates how “reparations for slavery” is a terrible way to phrase the argument.

We have plenty of evidence that groups of people aren’t starting at the same point. Making it a case because of history opens up the far-right changing the narrative to try to argue stuff like this, and we don’t get to discuss the

there’s a world of difference between fighting for civil rights, and being held to a different standard of any advocacy because of ethnicity.

I think what reconciles that is that broadcasting is not reporting. In fact, calling a game is pretty close to just being editorializing.