Because he’s a fucking coward

What better way to be a law and order politician than to pardon a man for willfully ignoring the rule of law!

I’m sure he has a sharp view on the president’s service record, you know, since he’s an actual draft dodger.

For some reason that google translate pic makes me profoundly happy.

Rules question: Why is it a catch if he landed over the wall? Is it considered an out since he was on top of the wall when he first caught it?

👌

Can’t believe I’m the first to post this:

Absolutely true that it isn’t simple for everyone. But if venture to guess that many people who are overweight could benefit regardless.

“Fitness is gained in the gym, weight is lost in the kitchen.”

“Too many people equate low ethical standards with low IQ”

I can’t watch it. I still, for the life of me, cannot understand how someone could hear that man speak and then think, “yep. I want him to represent me!”

Not even a year into his Presidency and he’s lining up the next campaign. I imagine he wants as long a campaign as possible so he can bilk the RNC and right donors (events at trump spaces, salaries for family and friends, etc) and because he’d rather run than govern.

Honestly I think we are looking at the last, raging gasps of a small portion of America. That, combined with a cottage industry of rage stoking online, is having its day in the sun. While we have our problems with institutional racism, inequality, and the like, the vast majority of people in America just want to live…

Not to be Otto optimism, but yes we can. It’s shit, but we’ll get through it.

I’m sure the police would slowly break up a BLM protest if people showed up with rifles and body armor.

I like how approaching the tracks at 90 degrees requires you to point towards lanes of traffic, so that when you fall, you fall into cars. Really well designed death trap.

Philly is pretty explicit about not taking any pizza boxes. Kind of odd.

It’s almost as if the Democratic Party should’ve supported an actual progressive.

Not for nothing, but his review of the Statue of Liberty is pretty much exactly what David Duke and Richard Spencer say.

I’m very confused by this... where, exactly, is the ‘anti-dad’ sentiment in my comment? Is it the suggestion that 50yo+ men aren’t known for their fashion?