cranchy
Cranch
cranchy

I agree, but I’m still going to shake my fist at that cloud.

If Barsanti can’t bother to post a real article about it, why post real comments?

Posting a string of tweets is not an article. Try harder. Do better.

Deserve’s got nothing to do with it.

They don’t love you like I love you.

“386 episodes!”

What pop culture did I eventually come around on?

I assumed it was supposed to be “awkward phases,” because it’s nice to think that AV Club is maintaining some of its traditions post-Gawker, even if that tradition is a lack of copy editing.

More opportunities for John Wick action figures and play sets.

I don’t know how History Channel will work Nazis, the Bible, and Ancient Aliens into this miniseries, but I’m excited to find out.

So we are back to writing articles about something a few random redditors say and pretending it’s a thing?

Better make it three.

But it’s always saying such nice things about you!

Bird. Bird is the word.

Looks like there might have been some sort of settlement with the estate, and he got a letter saying the tweet writer had no evidence that Woods was addicted to cocaine. So that does sound like a win. It’ll be interesting to see what this does to the allegations about his cocaine use. Tamp them down or just put the

Ah, but I just said that she *wasn’t* a cokehead. Who is to say what Woods may (allegedly) or may not be?

That’s interesting, and makes sense. Thanks.

He doesn’t need words. He has those sweet sun glasses.

He called her a liar and she responded with a lot of detail about the encounter to back up her statement. It’s convincing stuff and a strong rebuttal. Plus, she’s not a cokehead. She gets my vote, for whatever it’s worth.