I have to say, she doesn’t look like she’s had a lot of work done to her face if this is really how she looks. She looks like a pretty young woman with a regular body.

She looks so uncomfortable, in general. Oy. She can feel however she wants about it and I don’t care to comment on her body either, but it’s hard to feel sorry for a family whose entire brand is based around making others feel bad about themselves. They’re always carefully controlling every image, every moment,…

They’re definitely richer and have lifetime access to the ears of their government at the highest level. The Queen, rather brilliantly, projects an image of powerlessness and inaction, while the family does quite a bit behind the scenes to benefit themselves. 

Except they aren’t powerless. They pretend they are but they are enormously wealthy (personal wealth) and wield lots of power behind the scenes. Consider the recent scandal about Prince Charles putting the kibosh on a law that would have allowed his tenants to buy their homes. 

My thoughts exactly :-)

That’s a lot of words for “show up at events to remind everyone we have a Prince working for us.”

I’d like to see how that attitude holds if George takes an interest in his Black friend’s Black granddaughter, niece or relative if they should happen to hit it off at a charity event 20 years in the future.

Its a very SV way of saying Business Relations.

It’s all very “protests too much” - doesn’t seem like anyone’s scrambling to find Prince Charles’ black friend to interview. Which, maybe that’s because there’s literally no one they could get to say nice things about Charles, but this scramble doesn’t reflect well.

All of this “Prince William isn’t racist” stuff lends credence to the idea that the person who had concerns about the skin color of Harry’s children with Meghan.

Congratulations. You managed to hijack the majority of this comment section with a (weird ass) discussion that has nothing to do with the actual issues presented in the article. Well done. 

Ironically, being upset about an actor taking a picture out of character is the kind of toxic, entitled fandom that made The Snyder Cut possible in the first place.

You should really seek medical help because you clearly can’t tell the difference between a fictional character and a real person.

A LOT of people are forgetting he had multiple seasons of Stargate Atlantis under his belt before any Conan-ing or Gaming of Thrones.

I actually really like the Momoa version of Aquaman. The character was always kind of lame, but only because they never really evoked the real and terrifying power of the ocean. Nothing made me feel smaller or more insignificant than being on a warship in the middle of a storm with waves bigger than us with nothing…

But the movie version seems to forget that he should be vulnerable to magic. There’s no way he should’ve been able to resist the Lasso of Hestia when WW used it on him at the memorial. That scene drives me nuts as a result.

Alternatively:

I would actually be a bit surprised if the whole point of this $70 mil self advertising event was actually WB/DC long winded attempt to put themselves in a positive light after all the Joss Whedon allegations.
“See, it wasn’t our fault. We tried to do good for a director that was mourning, and an actor who was treated …

“Fisher’s best move is likely to “start over,” maybe get on some Michael B Jordan productions or a Spike Lee joint, and work his way back up.”

Is it still an example of Snyder’s general over the top edgieness (in his movies) and lack of understanding of various DC characters?