It feels like we see this article almost daily now.
It feels like we see this article almost daily now.
“OMG Quick! Remove This ANDROID App That’s Really Malicious Malware NOW! It does all sorts of evil things and eats your kittens too! (And it’s also on Apple iOS too, where it’s still on the App Store, even though Google has already removed it, but) THIS ANDROID MALWARE IS DESTROYING YOUR PHONE YOU ALL!!!”
As usual, common sense provides immunity. I guess you couldn’t prevent an app from generating clicks to enrich its developers (boo, hiss to Apple and Google who are supposed to grant store status only to certifiably safe apps!).
Who downloads these weird, crappy apps in the first place?
You asked a question, making a point with which I disagreed. I explained why I disagreed, politely. You responded, I responded back. I’m sorry if that came across as mansplaining, but to me it sure seemed like good faith engagement on a platform designed to facilitate conversations. But sure...
Neither is your attempt to try and mansplain this to me. Oh, you mean gross jokes about women affect women? You don't say.
I promise that I am not taking this animated prospector doll quite as seriously as you think I might be
“ at no point in the scene is it implied that this is proper behavior.”
But it is, unquestionably, played for laughs.
I promise that I am not taking this animated prospector doll quite as seriously as you think I might be.
I think ApathyMonger is trying, and rather poorly I might add, to imply that technically, this is supposed to be the “actor” playing Pete, not the character from the movie.
The important part is that it’s played for laughs. Keep in mind that this is a faux blooper real. People came up with an idea for this vignette, wrote it, and animated it with the hope that seeing a lecherous old man attempt to coerce sisters to have sex with him in exchange for helping with their careers would get…
Technically, this is supposed to be the “actor” playing Pete, not the character from the movie.
I bet he uses that same reply with all the commenters. Typical Kinja.
If you’re asking me, I’d say that technically, this is supposed to be the “actor” playing Pete, not the character from the movie.
Then you have Beauty and the Beast, the whole premise is kind of disturbing.
Make sure to word the description as something like, “Toy Story 2 DVD BANNED VERSION!!!”
Boner jokes are okay as long as they are done with characters voiced by convicted drug dealers who got rat out their friends
6 of one: it’s a dumb joke in bad taste in a fake blooper reel in a movie twenty years old and no one will miss it.
Here I thought it was going to be the scene where Jessie takes off to save a toy and Buzz’s wings pop up while watching her. But then I remembered that’s actually in the movie.
“....is just a gross reminder of behavior that has been excused and overlooked for decades. It’s also an example of how the public is socialized to downplay this kind of interaction from a young age.’