the idea goes, then poor people of all races will have more money; then something else will happen; then racism will not matter or be healed altogether.

If there was a car in front of him, it would not have been left to his discretion to determine what a safe speed by driving behind a bullshit “virtual” car. Put him behind a real fucking car and everyone would go the same speed. Slamming into the safety car would have been better than slamming his fucking head into a…

Nascar has a safety car doing 55MPH on all cautions no matter what. Today, the speed limits take place instantly when a caution comes out. No partial track caution, no driver discretion, no confusion. Nascar fixed this over 10 years ago as cars were nearly hit racing back to the caution.

Hard to talk about Nascars safety cars when a Formula 1 driver was killed because F1 is too stupid to use them. Only in F1 is it a good idea to have cars flying around a wet corner at 100mph during a caution, directly into an accident scene.

I like how his car says BS Motorsport.

Especially since what he did was BS and not motorsport.

Bobbie Jo Gentry would probably find the AMX to be U.G.L.Y...

If you set your truck on fire, and rolled it down a hill, would you trade it for an AMC Spirit AMX?

All the millenials here born after 1988 won’t get this reference.

Thats the traditional difference between a coupe and a sedan. Sedans have a b-pilar whereas coupes do not.

Nearly all two doors are sedans. Sedans are defined by two doors with a B-pillar, coupes do not have a B-pillar. So the 4 series is a two door sedan, whereas the E-class is a two door coupe.

Nice Price. Would purchase and do this:

The 1980 Thunderbird had it. According to Wikipedia, it came out in 1980 on the Thunderbird, Cougar, Mark VI, and Town Car.

The whole thing screams ex post facto, which is unconstitutional. I hope they fight it in court.

Plenty is over my head, I’m 5’5”.

Do you understand how statistics work?

But they concluded that this difference is not statistically significant. The rate of fire for all vehicles is so low, that doubling that is still a really low number. So even if the design is quantifiably slightly worse, its not a meaningful difference.

http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/news/2012/…

“...12 fires resulting from rear impacts to Grand Cherokees in data from 1992 through 2009. Divided by the number of Grand Cherokees sold and the number of years they’ve been on the road, that gives the Grand Cherokee a rate of 0.43 fire deaths in rear end collisions per…

The risk of fire in the Grand Cherokee does not exceed the risk of fire in Explorers, S10 Blazers, Trailblazers, Pathfinders, or 4Runners, with supposedly “better” fuel tank designs. There is nothing wrong with the Jeep fuel tanks. They exceeded standards and function comparably to other SUV.

I’m sure its a psychological thing too. Most people probably don’t know what their local cruisers look like, but they’re used to slowing for Panthers for the past 20 years. I’m sure some people still slow for the 90s Caprices too.