At least you can tell it apart from the outside without having to walk within three feet of the three-quarter windows...

The build and material quality on these things is rather poor, so they are prone to falling apart. There's definitely a difference between maintaining your shit and negligence though. Negligence makes me sad too.

That's your chart!? Thats awesome!

That's your chart!? That's awesome!

That's all they are doing for the 50th Anniversary package? I guess I was expecting something more. My 40th Anniversary came with interior packs, a unique exterior color (Crimson - FX) with unique stripes and wheels in Arizona Beige. They only made a couple thousand total, and only 144 fully loaded with the V8 and 5…

I know a couple people who read it, not sure how many are commentators. When you mention FSAE, you're talking about the one at Chico State, right? Thats pretty awesome. I thought about it but I didn't feel i'd be particularly useful as a Political Science major. I work in automotive though over at Wittmeier.

Yep, you were over by the high school, that's awesome. When did you live in Davis?

530 here too. I'm from Davis but live in Chico.

Just saw the edit you did to your post. Andrew is forgiven since I believe he's an intern and he'll learn. Though now I'm wondering how many V6s GMC sold in the 1960s...

I get that.

"Ford says this year's demand for V6 trucks is the highest it's been since 1967, and obviously they expect the trend to keep heading that way."

A 300 you say?

Ive always wondered how one parallel double parks a motherfucker sideways....

Gone in Sixty Seconds (1974), Duel (1971), Vanishing Point (except the ending)... most older car movies have much more realistic driving.

They never used the C4 or C5 in the half ton trucks, only Rangers and Bronco IIs and such. It was probably an AOD (C4 with OD) with a broken Overdrive or something. That instant torque is really what they were made for and airport Tugs are the perfect application. They also use them in stationary applications and they…

Compared to the generation before it, it sucked quite a bit:

Your problem there was the 3 speed transmission (which would be a C6), first off. Secondly, the truck makes 150hp, but close to 300lb-ft at an insanely low RPM range. I'm not sure about your piston knocking or harness issues, but I've never heard of either before. You are entirely right about your shit fuel economy…

This Alfa.... its what a modern day Datsun Z car should look like, not the angular catfish that is the 370z.

Too bad they killed Plymouth.

You could listen to Toto...