Sure. But I don’t think that’s sufficient reason to not report on it. 

Depends what your assumptions about this are.

Good lord. 

Our highways aren’t designed generally to the standard the autobahn is.

“this is extremely dangerous and highly illegal and the police could still use this as evidence and change them with multiple crimes”

They don’t actually post the data until much later. I believe they provide the data to a 3rd party to confirm the record. 

They did add extra fuel tanks, but I think even then they had to refuel.

They need to perfect refueling while driving to really amp up the danger. 

Well, here’s the thing: you don’t get to pretend things you don’t like don’t exist. This is noteworthy. It’s also of note that it’s very dangerous and illegal. 

Oh man, the comments in these articles are just amazing to watch. 

This is all true. If it’s Mahindra’s view that there’s no issue, then going to Jeep would have hurt that.

Yeah, they didn’t make it look like a CJ because of their long history of making them in India.

Yeah it would. 

People like loud shit, this should not be news. And it runs fine, it’s just adds additional revs and exhaust open. It’s also not something you need to use, much less every time.

In that case they built the scooters in India, which may have avoided the issues here, also it’s a different agreement, so who knows.

Given the intent of the F Type is to be a GT, I’m just never going to be that shocked that it tops out where it does with a supercharged V8 and all wheel drive. Shit’s heavy. 

What if both parts end up being relevant?

It would seem Jeep feels that the agreement was specifically limited in a way that makes the Roxor not allowed. 

FCA would seem to indicate they paid for a specific thing, that is, making CJs in India, not in the US. 

They have a license to build it... in India, would be FCA’s view on it. Also Jeep has existed the whole time, under different owners. If Mahindra were bought out by Tata today, would that invalidate their claims?