In that case, lining up to the side is still smart. Also, planning your route to hopefully not be in that situation a ton is good. 

My whole point was that the binary takes this shit generates are old. I specifically didn’t say that bicyclists are just as bad or bring up a false equivalency. But people do need to look at car/bicycle interactions overall and not jump into the taking sides shit, which the OP was doing preemptively. 

I honesty don’t think bicycles should be treated the exact same as cars, but yeah, running intersections is a huge issue. Being visible and predictable is so important  

Your specific experience isn’t the same as data. And they’re likely not flying in The G650/G700 class.

“Most cyclists just want to safely get where they are going and are doing their best to do so.”

Coal is used to produce electricity.

“What the hell does someone do with a big ass plane to themselves?”

It’ll look like a G20 with a lip spoiler and a diffuser. It’s not a giant leap. 

It’s successors being bad doesn’t suddenly make the E60 and it’s awful front end good.

The comments here seem to be reacting as if this is more novel than it just being the G20, that’s been out for a year, with a lip spoiler, a diffuser, and wider hips. 

No. Two things can be simultaneously bad. 

Holy false choice, Batman!

They decided the 2nd gen should be worse, but kept it to Europe.

Did you really just wait a month for him to have some better games to bolster your argument?

The changes that GM was making that led to a prolonged UAW strike specifically are because GM is making significant changes to prepare for the long term. 

Ah yes, GM and Boeing, two great examples of unfettered capitalism.

No, it all comes down to building vehicles where it makes the most sense from a efficiency and trade standpoint. 

Which, it is. Goodness, that’s a great point. 

Subaru tries to have it both ways. 

Economy and utility? Sounds like  RAV4 Hybrid.