Might as well have a “Wateriswet” tag. It’s just assumed.
Remember, someone thought Nathan Peterman was the answer.
You’re looking for a logical explanation. Lemme stop you right there....
Total career earnings according to Spotrac:
But it’s ugly. And no fun.
Bomb Iran?
Really spectacularly well, actually. The improvement in worker conditions, first for union workers and then as a knock-on effect for non-union workers, was one of the spectacular success stories of the 20th Century for Western countries.
What about the IMS bearing?
So I realize I’m getting distracted, but:
Winner.
The racist bits are beyond shitty. And the DV jokes are lame. But let’s not throw too many stones from our glass house on the latter issue.
“Wichita?” -Peter King
So we’ve got all these fancy-ass basebally metrics for football now- is his throwing velocity down? Is his launch angle off? What about his BBABABABBABAABABIPITYBOO?
The difference is that those other cars have built their reputations on things besides power, like quality, luxury and handling. Cadillac’s sole non-marketing-bullshit selling point for the past 15 years has been “look at how much power you get for the money!”
By and large, jacks-of-all-trades who are pretty good at multiple roles are assigned less value than highly competent specialists in the NFL. Look at the draft and free agent markets for dedicated pass-rusher DEs versus the more well-rounded and versatile equivalents.
Not only well-paid with a media platform, but with the ability to punish a player who takes additional visits after he tells them not to if they do end up at Miami. “You weren’t all-in with us? Then maybe you don't get playing time"
If he framed his recruiting as “This is the right decision for you. If next year it looks like the wrong decision, we’ll release you so you can play immediately for another team” then I’d say you have a leg to stand on.
I have a saying, and I’m sticking to it:
Warning: secondhand physics stuff that I have not confirmed, but am repeating anyway