comicnerd2
ComicNerd
comicnerd2

I thought the weird thing about this movie was the cast seem to be all supporting cast and character actors. 

Look Mortal Kombat should be the easiest  movie to make. It just needs a tournment, some interesting fights in interesting locations.  

The thing with 3D is that it always makes the world look small. I go to the theatre to watch a larger then life screen and enjoy a movie. There is something lost for me having to watch it through 3D glasses that constrain your viewing field. It always feels like I’m watching a movie through a window. 

Is that really Tiffany or a wax statue? She’s definitely a Trump with the awkward posing and plastic face.

I think one of the problems with the EC is how it’s all or nothing for each state’s votes. I know everyone complains that it wouldn’t be fair if California and New York to decide the presidency, but is really any fairer that a senator from Kentucky can override the will of so many people, in the name of equal

I’m glad I’m not the only one that things this series looks cheap. After all the years and attempts to make a big budget adaption, it ended up at the home of 800 procedurals. Everything about the show, with the exception of casting, was done to keep costs down. This should have been an event mini series, maybe 4 or 5,

I have to disagree, this has a Gremlins vibe to it. It also seems like a real scene rather then whatever Ghostbusters 2016 was edited together from.

I would argue that most of the cast was fine, I will agree with Lloyd, he was too young. I think the main issue is no one is given anything to do, all of the relationship building and journey to Boulder is all cut out. 

Can we talk about the bizarre editing where the show seemed to include spaces for ad breaks? It’s also clear this was not the big budget adaption most of us were hoping for. Out side of a couple of establishing shots here and there, it felt cheap. Obviously the advent of digital effects and digital cameras have made

I just finished the show, it’s only recently been available in Canada. I’m trying to process how a 6 hour mini series was able to feel like more was covered then a 9 hour series.

The flashback structure is what sinks this adaption. I would also argue the tv show format doesn’t help either, it was annoying when it was obviously edited to include commercial breaks. There is no flow to the flashbacks and we don’t get to know the characters. The must frustrating part is it does have moments where

After watching the movie, I think the Whedon reshoots were less extensive then people had thought. In all honesty, I can only think of maybe 3 or 4 scenes that were new in the Whedon cut, the rest were frankenstien inserts to include jokes in existing scenes. Most of Whedon’s work seem to be cutting the movie down. I

I think this Batman costume makes Batfleck look too bulky, like a kid wearing a snowsuit that constricts his movements. 

Question for those who have watched both versions, does it seem like Wheadon’s reshoots were less substantial then it appeared? Just going by some comparison videos on youtube it seems like it’s more of editing then major reshoots. Even Superman battling Steppenwolf looks essentially the same. 

I’m genuinely curious to see the movie, the reviews either say it’s a masterpiece and those seem to indicate it’s a completely different movie. On the other hand the less then enthusiastic review say it’s surprising how much of the movie is the same just with extra additions. I’m thinking that if that’s the case,

I actually think the action in Avengers is superior to Man of Steel and BVS. There is a clarity to it and the action is kept on the ground with the characters. The ending of MOS feels like a video game because we are watching everything from a distance there isn’t anything in the way of personal connection during the

Am I the only one who thinks that Snyder’s visual prowess is overblown? While there are a couple individual interesting frames, I find that the locations are very bland, it’s mostly warehouses and there is very little visual difference between Metropolis or Gotham. The theatrical cut of Justice League suffers from

I think if nothing else this movie will be a curiosity and gives us some insight into the filmmaking process. I didn’t like either of Snyder’s DC movies and Justice League was as bland and medicore as they come but I’m curious to see just how much of the movie has changed. I’m really skeptical that the over all movie

I think the whole 4:3 thing is another of the retcon stuff for the Snyder cut. I have seen shots that were in both trailers and some on the Whedon version are wider then the Snyder version.

Here is a question I have , are the locations in the movie any more interesting then the theatrical cut? The only visually interesting one was at Superman’s memorial, the other 2 were some sort of underground sewer and the finale was just some generic abandon town. Is there something more visually exciting then these ?