In reality the citizen will sue the PD and the taxpayers will pay for it. Justice. 

once there is hypocrisy on one side, the other side will start playing that game.

Here ya go, just as far as the “both sides” argument goes, maybe some data would be a more effective way to discuss:

The funds you are referencing (for Clinton’s legal defense) were rejected. All he did was grant a visa to a foreign politician, thats pretty normal. If you want to talk about whether his policy stance toward China was effective,sure, you might have a point - it may have been the wrong move. But that’s a lot different…

Except it is a big deal.

Lol this guy is saying they werent real contenders when they took a 3-2 lead on the greatest team to ever play NBA basketball in 2018 semifinals

It’s clearly a waste of time replying to you

So I agree, it is a systemic problem that is fostered by our two-party system. However the GOP version is a much worse symptom and is threatening to kill the entire body (Democracy)

Agreed, its kind of like talking about how police do bad things to black people and then someone else brings up that police do bad things to white people, too, just not as bad.

Lol, getting a consensual blowjob versus obstruction of justice in an ongoing investigation to whether foreign powers interfered in a US election

If he had said:

I’m not victim blaming him. I’m saying that as a teenager, many people seek attention by threatening self-harm who have no intention of going through with it. This is a plausible alternate explanation for this girl’s behavior - that she failed to grasp the reality of his intentions and that she understood this to be a…

As I pointed out in the PS, the thing that makes this data unreliable is you have no way of determining how many drunk people are out there NOT getting into accidents and how drunk they are.

Listen, you’re responsible for your own actions. If this was an adult telling a child to hurt themself, OK, but this was a child telling another child he wanted to hurt himself, and that other child did the wrong thing and told him to go ahead and do it.

I was more interested in the effects of drivers .08 and below, since while that is the legal limit, there is an obvious trend starting before that arbitrary point which I thought was interesting.

In some states if you are over the legal limit and you kill someone in a car crash, that is vehicular homicide, aka manslaughter. You were correctly establishing that this statute in many states varies by the BAC, like how egregious speeding versus minor speeding would dictate the offense.

At no point have you presented any evidence that I thought this, you just keep saying it

Oh let me fix that:

Just because you made a second burner to argue that driving drunk is cool doesnt mean you’re not the same guy, bud

Hahaha, stop lying, you really thought I was saying that killing someone while DUI wasn’t a crime