cobleymj
cobleymj
cobleymj

Not if the team being in the game is worth any less than $15k. I can imagine after this there’ll be an isolated boycott of some kind in Iceland, but I can’t seriously believe that the team being in the game is going to net them thousands more sales than they would already have made.

A likely story

Ah yes, tattoos and facebook show an obvious criminal family history. He’s also a minority too, that probably means he has a criminal record. /s

They played through “overtime”.

1) Call people entitled assholes.
2) Declare your ethics to be universal.
3) Click Publish

ect

But Donovan didn’t spend his entire career in the US. He spent plenty of time warming benches in Europe.

Wouldn’t work in a system where every team plays everyone else home and away. And the last time the idea of playing a game overseas was brought up by the EPL the idea was unanimously laughed at. Won’t happen, shouldn’t happen.

Please read your first sentence again.

I’m fairly sure he’s referring to those who own a pick up truck where the bed has been used exclusively for light-beer transportation. But at the same time I highly doubt you’ve never internally insulted someone for their chosen brand/class of car.

I understand that. I’m just amazed they’d air it at all.

What is it you think he said? Go check the lyrics to the song. Why do you think he said they wouldn’t air it?

Wow. I guess its cool to say nigger on french TV then.

.....and yet your point had no grounds other than you don’t understand the rules of the sport

It is a quote from the article, the quote concerns american teams in the event, not viewership, and was quoted to highlight a foolish opinion.

Well thats trespassing if I’ve ever seen it

Thanks. Im starting to get it a little better now. I think I’m just jaded from the constant outrage, theres very few measured explanations of anything any more, I appreciate it

Tottenham don’t have to play in a car park for cup games though

Are you not making a subjective judgement on the validity of her identity though? This whole thing is pointless if the masses get to decree by committee who is allowed to identify as what.

Could someone please explain why her identity isn’t valid? I dont see how any of her past behaviour has any effect on it. She can be a liar and still identify as whatever she wants, right? I thought that was the point. I’m genuinely confused as to what the philosophy behind this whole thing is meant to be now that we