*the cartoon* that you are likely masturbating to

I just can’t star this enough. I’m the first to admit that Gawker, Jezebel, Deadspin, they’ve made a couple of mistakes in the years since I’ve been reading here, but I honestly can’t think of one other news/social/aggregator site that hasn’t made poor choices and suffered setbacks as a result.

All of his uploaded pictures are scantily clad women with large breasts. This guy is the epitome of “small dick” syndrome.

To be fair, she’s not a cartoon so that docks a few points in his view

If you’re an adult and your twitter avatar shows what you are likely masturbating to, then you are adulting incorrectly.

I was just going to say.... wow this guy is shameless. I think I will go send him a message mocking his tiny penis and dumb tweets.

Interesting choice in Twitter avatar. At least, he's showing his doucheness for all to see.

I can say with utmost confidence that this dude has the tiniest dick I have never seen.

Seeing his Twitter avatar tells me everything I needed to know about him.

as tough on sexual predators

Democracy Now has a heartwarming story about how this judge sentenced a domestic abuser who almost killed his wife in the incident to a weekend in jail, AFTER ENSURING IT WOULDN’T INTERFERE WITH HIS MONDAY WORK SCHEDULE. http://m.democracynow.org/web_exclusives…

I think that people are generally intimidated when in a courthouse in front of a judge. Also, really think that saying that to a judge would constitute the crime of contempt of court. Potential jurors can be held in CoC for not showing up for pretrial selection, so telling a judge to go fuck himself would certainly…

Persky made a controversial evidentiary ruling which allowed the jury to view seven photographs of the alleged victim “partying about a year or so after the alleged gang rape. In the photos, she is scantily clad, wearing a garter belt and what appear to be fishnet stockings.”

Oh, so victims are never allowed to party or wear fishnet stockings for the rest of their lives. Makes sense.

You’re completely missing my point. If the cost of the show wasn’t so high, it’d be more accessible to a varied audience. Same with all other shows. A Broadway show shouldn’t just be accessible to white people who make over $200k a year. I just....?

The average income of a Broadway theatregoer is over $200,000/year. 80% of the Broadway audience white. If you think the audience for Hamilton is vastly different than the people sitting in the houses of the other 39 Broadway theatres, you are sorely mistaken.

He also is working to make it so that inner city kids can see his show through their school for $10

Yeah, look, this is musical theatre. Old rich white people is the demographic for pretty much ALL of it. Hamilton is an oddity specifically because it’s one of the few that has attracted a young, diverse audience. But those young diverse ticket holders aren’t exactly the ones who are supporting Broadway.

I truly appreciate and value Lin Manuel’s talent, but if he’s at all dissillusioned into thinking his show is at all reachable to anyone but the rich, white audience, he’s sorely got his head up his ass. My roommate managed to get orchestra seats at $300/each a couple of months ago, and she told me the people around…

Jesus. Bad enough that the guy was lying to these women about the porn opportunities*, but then he went and got them super-drunk so he could rape them as well. What a fucking creep, and shame on the Seattle PD for not giving a shit.