circlejerkthynameisgawker
CircleJerkThyNameIsGawker
circlejerkthynameisgawker

If a heart and a lung could turn into a you, then ya you’d be right, otherwise its just shitty semantics. Pro-life stance is that a women isn’t responsible for a fetus up to 24 weeks, and, thats it. The rest of these hemming and hawing tells me that you don’t have the heart to say the truth, which is sad. If you

Yes fetuses and cancer, basically the same thing. “Money, time and effort” what do you deposit dollar bills up the who-who? Your reaching man and you shouldn’t have to be, its a pregnancy, its what all life comes from comes from it.

Thats fine and good, but I specifically want to hear the context of what she was saying, because now two people have replied to me saying, “it was edited, the bastards” when I asked specifically how it was edited. In the context of the snippets, shes seemingly admitted to selling fetal body parts, which is against the

I can’t watch baseball, non playoff nba basketball. Pretty much soccer, football AMERICAN style, college bball, hockey kinda guy in that order.

Wow. Thats kind of what I was feeling in the bottom of my stomach, fuck people who it is more important to fit an agenda into a situation then to tell the truth.

How do you know what kind of person anyone is?

Congrats cards in the mail

I keep hearing that those tapes were edited, not true, taken out of context, but no one explains specifically how they are. Can you clarify or link to clarify?

can a brother get a link?

I ain’t bitter Chusko. The reason I like it, is there is an aesthetic beauty to it thats difficult to describe but is similar to choreography of ballet or stage acting. Theres a variety of league and teams, so you can root for one in each. The game FIFA, is in my opinion, the most translatable sports game to come to a

After the play I spent a long time looking for a ruling about players covering the ball with their body and could not find one. To me when I saw it, thats what happened, I realize a lot of people disagreed but I thought it was a penalty for that reason. I looked for a solid 20 minutes and could not find a ruling about

And it wasn't A woman who had a fantasy, it was women in general.

About gang rape, and thats not what the short story is about, if you’ve read it. I have nothing against the man and am strongly considering voting for him, but I won't vouch for that, why do you feel the need to defend it?

And Bernie Sanders wrote a short story in his school newspaper that women fantasize about being gang raped.

The above post says nothing about abuse, and the court doesnt seem to be acknowleding it. I'm An idiot though, hope that made your day.

If there is abuse in the situation, the above post and seemingly the court are failing to acknowledge it at this point. Which seems far flung, but other people have said that so it obviously is coming from somewhere. It’s the courts job to protect the children, and if they aren’t that seems to me it would be the

What is it other than the deeming children under the age of consent not being available sexual partners for adults based on their lack understanding the dynamics of a sexual relationship? You can frame that in what ever soft language you want, that is the basis of the reasoning.

Je l’ai!

They will be able to attend publix and the cafeteria with a team chaperone, sources say.