Precisely. Here in WA, the Berners ignore the primary results. They like the caucus results which showed 75% support for Bernie. Fun fact, a number of years ago, Pat Robertson was able to game the Republican caucus and win. The Republicans did the right thing afterwards and went to a primary system instead.

35 votes out of 400 is nearly 9%. That’s a lot.

No. Manic progressives supporting Sanders (and later, Stein, after Sanders backed Clinton) perceived that Hillary was a blood sucking monster. They were/are wrong. She was not and is not.

Berners. NeverHillary folks. Using “guys” in its generic, non-gendered sense. You started complaining about conspiracies before the primaries ever began and never let up. You saw a plot hidden in every shadow.

Bernie lost every debate they had. You should be thankful there weren’t more.

Yes. We have EVIDENCE that Comey did it. That’s why we believe it. All you have is emails exposing that the DNC kinda hoped secretly for, Hillary to win.

Actually, it wasn’t even close. She had Sanders dominated from Super Tuesday onward. He never caught up. Just because he didn’t drop out doesn’t mean he almost won. I swear, you all are the worst ever at math.

So Bernie won, even though he didn’t (because of closed primaries) because he almost won. Does that mean Clinton also won, even though she didn’t (because of the electoral college) because she almost won?

Oooooh, I’m so afraid.

I share your pain. I’m a WA Dem PCO and my LD is crawling with them.

And it should have been the Falcons.

The party does represent you, just like they represent (care about) everyone in this country. Take a look at the platform Clinton ran under. But you didn’t get your way 100%, so it’s not good enough for you. Maybe you should leave the party.

You win. Perfectly phrased.

It’s always a big conspiracy to you guys. Seriously.

It’s a good question. Because when you look at the actions of the DNC during the primaries, apart from doing some off-the-record cheering for Hillary, they did nothing to actually influence caucuses or primaries anywhere. There was zero voter fraud. Sanders lost fair and square to the better-qualified individual. She…

I’m a progressive and I supported Clinton. You don’t get to redefine a word to fit your narrow requirements.

You have an innacurate view of the number of Sanders supporters in the oarty vs Clinton supporters. I reference the 2016 primary, that Clinton won by 4 million votes. Even today’s vote, 235/200 shows about the same percentages for Berners vs Hillbots. Your guy is a 40-percenter. There was a VOTE today that just proved…

You forgot to add, “and enough angry progressives refused to vote for Clinton, causing her to lose the four swing states” to your assessment.

Here’s a typical reaction from WA State’s Berner/Stein faction, who are under the delusion that they represent a majority here: