That's why in Minority Report it was ambiguously moral, they DIDN'T know for 100% certain because the people had not yet committed the crime, and the pre-cogs were not perfect. With time travel we do know because they did do it. Similarly, in Minority Report, the ambiguity would (in my opinion) go away if the pre-cogs…

There is no ethical problem killing Hitler before he has killed anyone as long as you are 100% sure that he WILL.

Please tell me I'm not the only one who thinks that cover illustration looks like the female reproductive system.

Right? I wonder if the usual hair person got sick at the last moment or something.

But calling it hotmail (or even the new hotmail) highlights the few similarities much more than it highlights the many more differences and improvements. I would bet that if it had never been referred to as hotmail, a lot more of these people who are giving an emphatic no would be willing to give it a try. You could…

Was I the only one who thought that this episode was SUPER heavy handed with the parallels? Everyone was constantly mentioning and talking about the abuse of artifacts, and it was pretty obviously setting us for the how the various characters are going to feel when the find out what Artie did, especially Pete's "I…

this will probably be windows 8's client

I'm not sure why Giz keeps calling it hotmail. Other than the fact that its an email client made by Microsoft, it is completely unrelated to hotmail.

No. For one reason and one reason only (well, one unsurmountable reason): gchat

No, you wouldn't break it up like that. But I think calling them both, The Hobbit: There and back Again would be perfectly fine and work with a two parter

You are being awful flipper-ant with these jokes about a sealious issue.

It's especially maddening when you realize that the old title was literally perfect for a two part movie: There and Back again? Come on.

I got my name, but really i did it just in case. While I agree that it looks nice, and I don't have a problem giving people an @outlook email address, there is one huge reason I won't be switching: gchat. It is my only instant messenger and having it integrated and not needing the desktop client is worth it. And while…

I think this needs a big whopping dose of "lighten up".

its @outlook.com now.

Even in this day and age, not everyone has a tv with HDMI inputs. Like poor little 'ol me.

You know I'm not the author of the article right?

I don't know him, and I'm in a different field, so I can't comment on his credentials. I did find one article (not a journal article, just internet article) he wrote evaluating bigfoot footprints. His evalutation however has nothing to do with whether or not they are genuine. He starts off with the assumption they are…

none that's actually any good.

Dear person who keeps eating my mastadon bones,