But they split for a reason. If the guy doesn’t want to have a kid with the person he’s no longer with, how is it in any way moral to force him to do so?

I know who i’m backing

See, this statement right here is classic white priviledge. White woman hits black dude in a disagreement. You want the black dude to go to.....the cops???

THIS.

Well it’s a good thing I didn’t say it was natural for most consumers to be male. I said it was natural that the industry would cater to the largest consumer base. You know, how markets work.

We’ve all had bad sex partners. Communication is important for a healthy sexual relationship. If your partner isn’t attentive, they’re a bad partner.

I already said the way to address that is for more porn that caters to women, not to push others to consume things that they fon’t care for.

There are plenty of double standards to go around. A man that like sex is a pig. A msn that watches porn is a pig that exploits women. Just look at the comments here. And if a guy doesn’tbwant to have sex, he must not be a real man, or he must be gay, according to women.

She’s never been a teenage boy. I have. Most of us know the difference. To suggest we’re just incapable is just sexist drivel.

No, it’s not a real thing according to neuroscientists. You’re engaging in junk science.

Agree with you on repression. I guess it’s more a matter of alternatives to sexual expression and release. I’m not sure if there are other forms of fantasy media that aren’t porn, though. I mean, that’s what porn is, sexual fantasies. There is erotica, but it’s not for everyone.

I never understood deep throating. How is it in any way more pleasurable, your getting to a point on the dick with fewer nerve endings!

Porn addiction isn’t an actual thing. Other than that, I do agree that general awreness of porn’s problematic aspects is vitally important given its influence on sexuality.

I don’t think anyone is saying porn is a universal good. There’s very little in the world that is. The issue is that there are those saying it’s universally bad.

The coverage on Jezebel is all raging about the fact they still played a football game, not one single word about the woman that did this, other than complaining that some people are rightly calling for her head.

It’s just as impossible for you to know whether the debice you used to type that was made made without slave or otherwise exploitative labor. Are you going to scrap it because of that? Because if not, your argument is self-serving, rather than moral.

Also true of every woman that says she’s good at oral sex.

Agree. My view of oral sex is that it’s the prerogative of the giver. It’s wrong for the recipient to require it, or to force the giver to do it in a certain way.

So, odd and perhaps dorkiest Playboy story ever. An old colleague of mine was trying to get a lengthy research story placed and Playboy was the outlet that ended up giving him the best terms, so that’s where he published it.

This just has no basis in fact, and it seems more rooted in the Puritanical attitude that teens shouldn’t be sexual beings.