I don’t know how to link to it since I’m on my phone, but I commented on one of the previous articles here about all the evidence that was left out and systematically went through the “evidence” that is supposedly damning. If you click I my name I’m sure there’s a way for you to find it and read. But the “sweat” DNA…

I guess I feel like your average person on a jury might err on the side of guilty when the evidence even leans that way a bit just to avoid potentially unleashing a murderer on the community.

A forensic witness admitted to examining Avery’s car then examining Halbach’s car without changing gloves, according to the filmmakers. This evidence didn’t go very far in court (because it was clearly contaminated), so it was left out of the doc. Not to mention, they did not find this evidence until much later, after …

This “other evidence” sourced from repulsive reprobate Kratz and the way people are uncritically buying it while at the same time calling the doc “biased” is the reason I can’t move on. It’s driving me fucking nuts. The full context paints a far different story than what Kratz would have us believe. People buying what…

hmmm—curious as to what you read that makes you say this? After the series i read A LOT and there were a few things that were omitted in the documentary that do indeed count against him, but the overwhelming questions, does not make a guilty verdict.

on the other hand, i do agree with you—i’m not out signing petitions…

It never was about deciding guilt. It is about deciding if both of them received a fair trial. Avery’s case was put together by officers that owed him MILLIONS of dollars, hated him, and had wrongfully incarcerated him on purpose before. The kid hardly has shit for brains and yet got forced to confess all kinds of…

I think, but i’m not entirely sure, and am not looking it up right now that Brendan is already part of the Innocent Project. His case is an outright disaster and there’s no way he should be in jail, period, let alone not have been declared a mistrial. But from what i gathered at the end of the documentary—Brendan did…

Uhh the “overwhelming evidence” that was left out was largely circumstantial. I didn’t know having porn was considered evidence that you were a murderer.

It’s interesting to watch- not for deciding if Avery was guilty or innocent, but to witness someone not receiving a fair trial, the amount of corruption in small-town sheriffs departments, and how the system is build to chew up the poor and uneducated. All of these issues are present regardless of Avery’s guilt.

Girl. I am so sorry. But seriously, fuck that guy. I remember your stories from Christmastime, and it sounds like you’re honestly going to be better off without him. I can’t even get over how inconsiderate it is for you to be so sick (and lithium poisoning is no joke, my mom’s had it) and him not only not helping out,…

Re: any career path.

Yes, I definitely think it’s more the (perceived) fact of being a non-traditionally attractive woman who believes herself to be undesirable that results in the exoskeleton rather than the career. My job is pretty damn far from comedy/acting/performance of any kind and, lemme tell you, I’m the funniest, most…

Lenk was creepy AF.

That Pajiba article should not EVER EVER EVER be cited. He says he “found a few pieces of evidence not presented in the docuseries that persuade me that Avery was probably guilty.” FUCKING LIES.

where are you getting this information from? Did you happen to notice the number of cars on that lot? Wouldn’t it stand to reason that he had multiple listings and had to deal with Auto Trader often? Would you prefer to deal with the same person? He came to the door in a towel. Done it myself when I was running late.…

I don’t think most people who watched the series think Steven Avery is an upstanding human. Dude obviously was a creep and had some boundary issues with women. That doesn’t mean I’m okay with him being convicted for a crime it’s unclear if he committed.

Plus, the entire town seemed pretty vitriolic toward Avery. I’m sure it’d be very difficult to live in that small community facing public backlash for being the one person who voted not guilty.

Yes that’s the cop I meant. He wasn’t even supposed to be on the property and yet it was him who found the keys. Pretty outrageous.

Don’t forget her ex-boyfriend or her then-roommate. Significant others and ex-significant others should always be considered. And her male roommate (and apparently a good friend of the ex-BF’s) didn’t report her missing at any time during the three days between when she went missing and when her family reported her…