This is so Canadian I can’t handle it.

This comment is about the Browns, right?

Is there something blacked out on the F16s? About amidships on the fuselage.

I always forget that people do not not understand the difference between fact (the titanic) and fantasy (the bible).

Long ago I worked on as a blimp crew. I always found it odd that the one thing securing the blimp to the mast (the mast being the tall pole that anchored the blimp to the ground) was a metal pin maybe the size of my pinky finger. That was all that prevented the blimp from cutting lose.

While obviously this is a…

Way behind the curve on this post. Been playing WG, WG:ALB and WG:RD for far too long. While I’m excited to see a post about the game, I must say, the deeper water naval engagements are terribly handled. Mass blobs of ships take away from the otherwise amazing game.

04:02:28.
Nice job!

We were both humor writers and bicoastal entertainment industry expats in our small beachside town, and our age difference—I’m 35—had never been a barrier to our friendship.

Half these people have valid complaints. The other half have issues with bugs or are hypochondriacs.

1) Depends. The tampering helps kane if the kit confirmed any of his DNA on the vic. By potentially breaking the chain of custody the evidence might be either inadmissible or will be given less evident weight. For this to hurt Kane something crazy would need to happen - like it be proven he directly caused the kit to…

That was my thought as well. Unless the NCAA ties its definition of gambling/prohibited conduct directly to the statute’s definition of gambling (and its exemptions), then it seems that as a private entity the NCAA would be free to define the term as it sees fit.

Sorry, but the criminal laws exist for a reason. I’m certain your settlement money is nice though.

I fully support the States who’ve forbidden parties from entering agreements which effectively resolves a criminal matter. Its patently unfair, favors of the charged party, disadvantages poor people since they have no means to settle, and does nothing to further the causes of justice.

This varies widely by jurisdiction here in the U.S.

Why leave tolerant Mississippi for Boston?

Such even numbers!

Did I just read cum? Yeah, I just read cum.

Not even reading. If at will then yes. If under a CBA then prob not unless the termination is for something like misuse of company property / stealing time.

This isn’t that abusrd in unionized labor arbitration. In my field of work the feds pay for third party neutrals to arbitrate discipline or contract disputes. But the arbitrator defers to the on-property handling, and in the case of discipline, the on-property includes a disciplinary hearing where a company officer…

does this mean isreal will assassinate Obama next time he goes swimming, you know, for the whole iran deal?