Named her kid “Christian,” believes in reincarnation when profitable.

And they just lost their “argument ender” card after 11 years of enjoyment.

“How does your client pleat, though?”

“Why won’t those obstructionist Democrats vote to repeal their own bill?”

“We tried to do Democrats a favor, but it just didn’t work out.”

“You know, I’m not too sure about your police work there, Lou”

It’s funny to watch you guys struggle to defend yourselves when you’re not interacting with the usual hive-mind commenters.

If it means bridging the gap between us and finding more common ground because they see the systemic flaws in the other side, resulting in political victories, that’s a good thing.

More like a bear trying to draw a map

Just a reminder that Theo Epstein is #1 on this same list.

I can see why Democrats claim to be the “inclusive party” these days.

I have no rational argument against this. Even half of Catholics can’t get behind the Cool Pope as awesome as he may be.

I love the way you guys attack everyone who might overall be on your side politically because they deviate at certain points. And then the next article will be full of comments about why all the BernieBros elected Trump, or the Steiners elected Trump or the Gary Johnsons elected Trump. Not about the people who voted…

Maybe it’s because the culmination of his life’s work Power Rangers is about to be released in theaters on Friday?

My goodness that was the most obnoxious, misleading, unfunny introduction to a product review of all time.

My point was more that it’s wishful thinking to have a clearly defined motive from someone like this. At least one an average person would understand.

His Twitter handle was “jew_goldstein”

Don’t encourage this type of headline writing.

How the fuck did a ballet technique become sentient?

Time, dumbass.

Time, dumbass.