CelicaCROSS

...to the kind of terrible 1971 Steve McQueen vehicle “Le Mans.”

I can’t help but think there’s an ulterior motive here..

It was?

I guess the analytics don’t outweigh the outrage?

Nobody wants to even contemplate more than one. *SHUDDER*

I’ve lived near the California coast my entire life, and the sea air here leaves a fine layer of dust on your car 5 minutes after you wash it, but none of our cars are rusting out because of it.

These Broncos are uncomfortable, they ride and drive like ass, and if you lift it at all that gets 100x worse.

Because it’s called Nice Price, No Dice, not Nicest Price, No Dice.

For the 47th time, just because you know how to use Google and found similar cars that are the same price or cheaper, doesn’t mean that this one still isn’t a Nice Price.

As the target buyers for these older American classics start to drop (i.e. boomers), so will the value of them. No dice.

Keep in mind too, when all of the sites (Splinter, Jezebel, Deadspin, etc.) were all under the same roof, viewers were much more likely to head over to the other sites to have a look - all they had to do was scroll to the top of the page and click.

A “real newly rich” person would be buying a new Lambo...

Hard to feel bad for someone’s toy car that costs more than the houses ordinary folks can’t even afford.

I’m with you, it looks great in silver. Lambos are the biggest “Look at me, I’m new money!” cars on the market, so I’m not surprised people on here want theirs in orange or highlighter yellow.

Relax.

Ya think?

Good design: Less is more.

Brutalism is a good word to describe the camouflage cladding we’re currently looking at, but we have no real idea what the actual car will look like yet.

Is that a serious question?