I say no point because the ST fractured things. Regardless which side you’re on, it did alienate a lot of people - including the actors. It still comes with baggage if you jump 20-30 years.

If they don’t jump way back or way forward, there’s not point.

Likely you can’t sue them for changing the agreement until they actually change it.

Wrong. The state was not providing them anything, they paid for it all themselves direct.

They don’t act as their own government. They run fire protection, a security force, and pay for their own roads (ie build and fix them), and handle their own trash service. As i’ve read, that’s largely it. The handle all that stuff themselves.

Yeah, but she was liked fired over the blue rollout and i’d bet a ton the failure was due much more to interference from above than her work on the project. But elon won’t fire himself, so gotta have a scapegoat.

I needed a laugh :)

So, big corporation cheats the rules to not have to spend money to be compliant and make sure people are safe.

Well, you could say it’s the difference between defeating Tony Stark and defeating Iron Man. Scott only had to defeat a tech-less version of Kang, quite clearly, his ‘power’ came from the suit and nothing else. He’s stronger and a better fighter than Scott, but Scott is never ever shown to be a good fighter in any MCU…

If DC ever does anything right, people might care if they object.

The best times for movie releases were always memorial day weekend and 4th of July weekend. Big hitters always went there for the big bucks. Marvel bucked the trend when they started their showcase flicks in early May.  Then next biggest time were around thanksgiving which has evolved to the two weeks before…

The problem is the government works for large corporations, it’s like saying the 10 year old kid has to watch over their parent - it doesn’t work that way.

It would likely be a mandated app by right wing states if it was pushing their agenda. It’s not, so it has to be banned - not that it needs to be on government devices to begin with.

I would question WHY anyone would put this on any state owned, federal owned, or even corporate owned device?

I have it through a Sony TV (android TV) and the app is the worst thing i’ve seen. It’s just SLOOOOOOWWWWWW. Netflix, amazon, etc are all fast as can be, but not peacock. No motivation to pay them squat for a terrible app.

I want one with a painted back drop on a curtain and when they walk by you see the curtain wave in the breeze ala the Hartnell era :)

I want to the choice of no ads.  ads suck :)

I agree. Also, there is a saturation point. Subscription cannot go up forever. Not everyone is going to sign up and if the average household is, say, 3 people, your possible number of subscribers is population/3. It’s not possible to go up forever.

Considering we have our telecoms in the US (who are behind the world average a lot of the times) now offering 5GB connections, you can’t really call 1GB lines futureproofing.

As much as it’s in vogue to dump on Musk these days - and face, he’s earned lots more of than he’s gotten to this point - cutting the benefit here seems harsh, but who else gets that? I know my company of 80k people doesn’t. The employee share of benefits goes up and up every year. The costs of that treatment will go…