Or it’s an opening salvo by pissed off millennials who aim to disrupt hedge funds. Read an interesting report on BBC about this.

Probably less cocaine

As someone who works in finance tech (like Bloomberg terminals and IPC turrets) let me just say there isn’t a whole lot of difference between a trade floor at JPMC in Manhattan, and whatever the hell is going on over at Reddit.

BMW. Seriously they are so dead, or deadwood. No fun left.

“Bradley GT”

I love how nicely this plugs into the generic NP/ND comments we get on Jalopnik:

There must be some youtuber out there who is tired of fixing up late model lambos and trying to distinguish themselves from the pleebs

All y’all should give back your jalop card. The only correct answer (ok, besides Saab) that nobody gave is Lancia. I mean come on. They always were at the forefront of design, technology and innovation, so make a whole lineup of a new Stratos, new Delta, new Fulvia, new Ypsilon all with either electric or hydrogen to…

So just rename them Newsmobile and we’re all set.

Olds screams Grandma, not technological advancement.

Ditto. Honestly, everyone saying “this cheap car brand from whenever” is out of their mind. No cheap car brand is viable right now because everyoe is buying more and more expensive cars.

Packard. But not in a retro way, except for three things:

Spyker. It died in the early 20th century and has been resurrected many time since. It just filed for bankruptcy for the 10th time. So it deserves to be revived again. ;)

Saab!

Pierce-Arrow, and make damn sure Rolls-Royce is put in it’s place.

Amati. That way Mazda could stay mainstream and still have a luxury brand. Make all the models sporty hybrids or EVs to stand out and make sure they're all leaders in styling.

Duesenberg

I’d merge the ghosts of Tatra and Holden to make ballistic rear-engine Utes with air-cooled V8s.

Is this too obvious in the current market?

This is an easy one, but I’d also accept Studebaker or Auburn-Cord-Duesenberg: