Eh, I don’t know if it’s grooming, but...

I mean, I saw the routine and laughed at this bit, so I guess I was “hooked,” but the bit wasn’t framed as “here’s a humbling experience that helped me learn and become a better person” so much as “here’s a colossally stupid and fucked up thing I did. Full stop.” He’s a stand up, and talking about (an admittedly…

sigh

Agreed. And is it just me or does Isbell feel like Misty without the posturing schtick? (And I say that having loved his first three albums.)

Not like he needs the money anyways, he already owns every kind of classic car. He even owns doubles of some of them.

That was a bad choice, like a high-school-freshman choice. It actually made me less excited about this movie compared to when I saw the first trailer.  Despite being set in the ‘60s, I’m still hoping for swashbuckler energy, like when he’s riding a horse through the parade, but that music just didn’t help.

Does it make me a bad person that I took such joy out of the nonplussed reaction Jade had for Nate? Especially since he was feeling himself after the restaurants manager made such a big deal about him. Her “ I don’t give two shits about you” facial expression as she looked him dead in the eyes was fantastic.

for sure, and i bet you a million dollars the next holland one is gonna be about clones.

I just hope the unedited/unexpurgated versions are still available somewhere, somehow, and they don’t go down the memory hole.

it’s not even fan service it’s just referencing a dusty-ass meme. 

Concur. An incredible sequence.

Fuck the haters, I’m a millennial of a certain age and I am here for this shit.

“One of these days...! Kang, zoom!”

In addition, he’s been busted down to Jonathan Corporals.

I love Agatha Christie, but there’s always that one thing that makes you do a spit-take when reading. But editing that out for mass consumption? Ugh. Take the time to teach people about those slurs and why they aren’t appropriate, don’t just remove them, because you aren’t solving the problem, you’re ignoring it.

These reviews have been a real education in how there exists at least one person in the world to whom human interaction outside family and work is a completely foreign concept, and it’s been a fascinating dive inside that alien mind.

I guess that’s “Finally, someone (in power at the network) is listening to us” and “No one (in the general public) benefits from knowing anything.”

the “someone” is the employer. the “no one” is the general public. the statements are not at odds, you’re just noticing (dare I say nitpicking) a surface quirk of language along the lines of things like ‘why do we park in driveways and drive in parkways?’

“But maybe I’m selling this episode short”