canamrock
canamrock
canamrock

I wish they could take their animation department and give Bruce Timm and crew the backing to put an animated feature in theaters. They could make bigger stories for cheaper, while having a sense of style and care for their characters that might overcome the 'kiddie' stereotype and create a stronger contender to the

Consider the following: in "Batman Vs. Superman," Batman represents the fans' issues with Man of Steel, thinking this new Superman isn't a hero in his eyes. He's worked with Lex Luthor (the studios) to stop him, until he realizes that Superman can recover from his stumble and be the hero the world needs and deserves

Yeah, but can it stop a sword?

But the Copenhagen Interpretations vs. the Milwaukee Many Worlders is the rivalry of our time! D:

I don't see the problem. We're just having a fling.

Well, given that everyone makes a point that Superman just helped wreck infinite cityscape, flipping some of the plot elements on their heads creates a great parallel:

This is not quite correct.

True, but we're at least two years away from the film being done, and likely even in production. If they've got tracking that the storyline's being well received, it would be smart for Marvel to pick up on that. In any case, it should be well concluded by the time scripting is in process.

To be fair, while specific stuff may not copy over, Iron Man 3 was pretty clearly based on the Extremis storyline, so it's quite possible they could take beats from other newer stories and run with them. Especially when we're so far off from anything being set, saying "X movie will be based off of Y" doesn't mean

Two issues. Idris Elba was a military officer in charge of their essentially private force. He was far more reasonably put into the fight than Pres. Pullman. And the nuke didn't seem to destroy the aliens so much as their portal room. If the sequels happen, the rest of their society remains at large.

Look, this may be apocalyptic battle for the fate of the world, but damn it, we have a system. If everyone just shoots off super weapons willy-nilly, this whole affair would be a farce! Now, again, the order of procedure:

Seconded. One of the best shows on TV, and one of the best takes on near-future stuff in some time.

We'll just assume you mean like "gumshoe". :)

Well, only the first section of the credits (nothing at the very end). But without spoilers, it's a humorous reversal of a surprising part of the second act. Well worth it.

Not when you slapped me on the ass with it! D:

Not only do I agree, but I feel we must add a proviso. This is a reboot, this is the new Superman's first time at the rodeo. He really shouldn't be the perfect paragon of superheroism we've seen in comics - yet. My biggest hope is that the second movie riffs on the big issues of the ancillary destruction around

Soon: "Mel Brooks, you have failed this city."

Actually, that's not a deformity, but a consequence of viewing action through a Liel Field, as discovered the aether scientist Rutherford B. Liel in 1887. Many females with supernatural powers access them through a permeating Liel Field that distorts spacetime around them. This creates the optical illusion of the

Lana?

Atavisms. "Junk DNA". Feral populations of formerly domesticated animals. There are plenty of examples where the information that is 'lost' is actually suppressed rather than removed. Your understanding of how genetic reading works is just incorrect.