burner-just-to-star-how-generic-the-new-hellboy-is
Burner-Just-to-Star-How-Generic-the-New-Hellboy-Is
burner-just-to-star-how-generic-the-new-hellboy-is

I’m not really sure how ANYTHING that was written above was true. If Coach K is to blame, lets see what his play calling actually resulted in: 1) He called a play that literally had Zion with the ball (undercutting the entire premise of the whole critique), but Zion passed it to an open Barrett (how is Coach K to

This guy is absolutely off his rocker.

Dude, furiously spamming conspiracy theory articles at multiple people online to defend against the charge that you’re a crazy conspiracy theorist isn’t a good look. You’re even responding to yourself now to make supporting comments about the stuff you just posted? Just stop. This is sad to watch.

Hahaha, Shaq didn’t want to play for Orlando at all. You’re relying on Ayesha Curry’s tweet after Steph fouls out as evidence? And you don’t realize how insane you sound? And you’re basing that on the players bitching that the fouls that go against them must be bullshit? Not to mention the pure, unadulterated

No, please god don’t make these sorts of plays reviewable. The refs already look at way too many calls that they actually made to ensure they got it right. If they can go back and look at plays that already happened where they did NOT make a call in order to determine if they should have potentially done something

Responding to A) LA, Chicago, Miami, NY, and DC ALL had top 10 picks that year. Literally all of them. If the NBA wanted to put Lebron anywhere, they bump literally all of those cities ahead of friggin’ Cleveland.

This is a very dumb analysis. Just because something happened doesn’t mean it’s the ONLY thing that could have happened. Yes, the NBA, Nike, Lebron, etc., used the narrative that they were presented with and ran with it. What else were they gonna do- NOT use whatever angle they could to market the #1 pick and best

Yup. That’s one of the clearest fouls I’ve seen in a long time. The Warriors can say the game shouldn’t have been decided that way if they want to, but if you don’t want the ref to blow the whistle then don’t purposefully and obviously foul the one guy that you know the ball is going to be thrown to.

The whole story seems devoid of a lot of context about the game, as if its purposefully promoting one questionable interpretation of what went down. 

Can someone explain to me why TF the NBA would do something like that? What the hell is the benefit to them of having the greatest incoming basketball prodigy in at least a generation going to Cleveland of all places? Unless you think they did it just because they wanted to support and help a young 18 year old man who

Agreed. Complaining about that foul call is nonsensical to me. He’s CLEARLY grabbing him because he knows he’s beat. It’s not like KD started grabbing him after the ball flew past KAT’s head because he knew the game was going to another OT and just figured the play was over- he did it precisely to take away any chance

I had your mindset once. I bought Bloodborne when I first got a PS4 without knowing anything about it other than that review score on metacritic was great. I started playing it, got my ass absolutely handed to me for a while, and after a week or so I gave up on it. Thought it was terrible and just not for me. I went

It’s almost as if women have the right to choose what to do with their bodies, which includes the right to participate in her sushi art shows AND the right to not have men forcibly grope and kiss them. What a world we live in, right?

Way to go Deadspin comments section. You can rail against the sexist and misogynistic right for hours at a time for any perceived or implied action, but then this story comes out with video evidence of a woman being sexually assaulted and the top comments are discussing her looks and plastic surgery. Keeping it classy

Phantom foul? I’ll admit that live I was a little perplexed about the foul call, but that was because the guy was all the way on the far side of the screen. The replay clearly showed him getting the shooter on the arm and then slamming into his body. You can’t not call that and deny Purdue even a chance to get off a

The Beauty and the Beast remake was objectively worse than the animated version from the 90s, and it made more than a billion dollars. That’s why these are being remade. I am not a fan of them at all, but I get why they’re going to keep doing it.

You do realize that hollywood has been putting out anti-corporate movies for-literally-ever, despite being an institution rigidly controlled by corporations, right? I’m not sure why the author seems so surprised that the story centers around the little guy being taken over by the big guy for nefarious purposes. It’s

I’d say she was more Marky Mark than Britney based off of that video :)

I think those of us who came of age in the 90s need to admit that it was just a god awful decade for music. I’d go so far as to say the 80s was the last great musical decade, at least so far as rock is concerned. Grunge’s response to rock’s pretentiousness was worthwhile, but I feel like ever since then bands have

I’ll never understand this criticism. They’re literally trying to sell you something. Do you expect them to come out and say “eh, this is a pretty good version of some stuff you can get elsewhere if you really wanted to”? Every other company in every other market every where else in the world that holds press