I suppose you are also ok with the government passing laws censoring speech delivered through radio, television and the Internet, too?

The quesalupa is very hit-or-miss. I've had it a few times and about 50% of the time it's as you described and 50% of the time the cheese is warm and it is the tits.

Don’t you think it’s a little irresponsible to post a photo of the gunman? It will just feed into the racist narrative that sick, twisted assholes going on shooting rampages come in all shades and not just white Christians.

If that advertisement ever bothered you at all, much less still does so many years later, you are either a giant cunt or an exec at Unilever.

Somehow it’s even douchier to refer to MLB as the “Show” in reference to domestic violence. No offense.

You can see the same teal shirt behind him in both pictures, too.

Tough to imagine “I curb-stomped him in self-defense” but I've been surprised before.

Another reason not to come clean is if your SO is out of your league or your awkwardness, etc. makes it unlikely anyone else would ever put up with you. Better to be a scumbag liar than miserably lonely for the rest of your life. Totally hypothetical and doesn’t apply to me...promise.

This is cool, but honestly creating a new cable network is kind of like designing a new CD player.

Assuming they started doing so once it was 30-0 or so, it's plausible.

Never mind, missed the small print.

That is more of an indictment of the media though. This shit happens a lot in high school, especially girls sports where there is a great disparity in both talent and participation level from school to school.

Yeah, the media has a responsibility to only portray blacks in a positive light and only portray whites in a negative light, because racism.

She just needed a good beating to humble her. Uh, that came out wrong.

Tact. You not only don’t have it, you can’t even conceptualize it.

In that case, I like her even more!

That is not true on many levels. First of all obligation is vague. Legal? Ethical? Moral? If you are limiting this to a legal discussion it would depend on the contract and the relevant state law.

I mean, they could discourage it more I guess. Lifetime ban after first positive? Castration? Or contracts could have claw-backs and teams lose draft picks. Sure the union would go for the claw-back around never.

No, I asked if he ever said that. I don't think he did. If you read up you will see the common First Amendment trope that, while true, doesn't apply here. That was what I was trying to get across. Sorry if my wording was confusing.

You forgot “transfer wealth to your friends.” Definitely need taxes to do that.