Opening odds if this happens:

Pro-tip for the kids that will hardly ever use checks: when you get a set of checks that starts at 100 or 1000 you shred/burn the first book, which is like 50 checks. You will look like someone who has successfully used checks when you hand over no. 150/1050 and you will still have a lifetime supply of checks (450).

It’s different because women don’t play in the NFL or even college football. I’m not saying she can’t coach, but comparing it to a racial classification ignores this relevant distinction.

Did you mean to say this to me?

Good point, there is certainly a balance to be struck. Like I said before, I'm not taking his side.

Fair point, but I try to avoid going too far in assuming I can judge the merit of even expressing an opinion. I say that making it clear I'm not saying anything about what this guy said.

Incorrect views should also be permitted. Otherwise how are we to properly evaluate the respective merits of contrary opinions? By silencing even incorrect contrarian views you create an atmosphere of groupthink.

Perhaps to some extent, but I don't see the problem with adding some clarity. Also it is a common error so I think there is some stand-alone value to making that distinction.

Let’s not give in to that incorrect interpretation. And right to do so withstanding, there is a conversation about media’s ethical obligation to foster a marketplace of ideas. I’m not commenting on this guy one way or another, but I don’t think we should be so glib about a person getting fired for expressing an…

Does he suggest that this censorship was illegal under the First Amendment? There is a place for believing certain types of censorship are legal, but ethically or journalistically suspect.

Again, this is literally censorship and it is amusing that you don't understand a term while disparaging others for supposedly not understanding a term.

Your first sentence is factually incorrect. Censorship is the suppression of speech in any form. You are confusing the broad term “censorship” with the rights granted under the First Amendment. Now whether and to what degree a private network should censor its people, that is a complex question, though in most cases…

Also #7 Duke beat Indiana 94-74. Ingram led all scorers with 24.

I love when individuals write about how people should think and live with a tone that suggests their views aren't just their own stupid opinion.

I am amused when examples outside a general trend aren’t treated as evidence that the correlation of two things might be a coincidence.

So the defender had essentially stopped moving by the time Paul dove him to him and then flailed around like a French soccer player, but I’m assuming it was called a foul anyway.

Go for it, sport!

At least he wasn’t pouting in a post-game press conference.

I mean, are we not going to address whether the players were, in fact, scared to touch a black person?

That is actually incredibly easy to believe if you own a calendar.