Please provide the statute that gives a 13 year old legal protection from her parents cutting her hair.

NO.

diana gabaldon is a rape fetishist. That woman writes more rape into her books than she writes about Time travel and kilts. I mean I've read ALL the books and it's a common thread that runs throughout them this is just one of many scenes you can expect to look forward to

You realize you sound as tiresome as an MRA troll demanding to know why women freak out on him for yelling that they have a nice ass when he’s just giving them a “compliment,” right? If you are not educated enough about the society in which we live to understand why holding hands is different, in both degree and…

100% Agree. By walking someone on a leash in public you are making everyone you come into contact with part of the subs humiliation. Your reactions be they positive or negative become part of the sexual experience of the BDSM, and the bystanders in the mall did not consent to be part of that experience. If a couple…

I would say it’s the degree to which they make out. A little making out won’t get you kicked out of a mall. Trying to swallow each other’s heads often does get people kicked out of a mall, and should, in my opinion.

I could care less what consenting adults do in their home or in public spaces that are designed for this kind of play. But I would rather not be part of someone’s fetish without consent. Part of walking her on the leash in public is about getting a charge from people’s reactions.

I’ve been active in the BDSM scene for more than 10 years, and while I wholeheartedly approve of petplay and such, there is no way to solicit consent from passersby and therefore it’s inappropriate. Whether you practice RACK (Risk-Aware Consensual Kink) or SSC (Safe-Sane-Consensual), consent is absolutely necessary.…

I have a friend who has these kind of relationships and I make clear I want nothing to do with being around while they’re in the “zone” so to speak.

While I think open conversations are an important part of parenting, I think it’s kind of disingenuous to claim a parent can just tell their child that the man walking a woman on a leash around the mall is just “make believe.” Kids generally know that normal adults don’t usually play make believe in public and walk…

As a person who doesn’t want to see your (or I should say “their”) sexual play as I go about my daily life, I say, “Fuck no.”

Yeah, no. You don’t make me part of your sub/dom sexual play without my consent. There are fairs and clubs for that.

Do you really care about the shade of skin pigment of a fictional character?

What?! A movie changed the superficial elements of a character? OMG, that is so crazy. It’ll ruin the character because they’re clearly going to miss the essence of him. I can see why it makes you so mad.

Name one thing about Johnny Storm that this casting changes other than the color of his skin.

Is Hugh Grant still a danger with college freshmen?

On private property, like a mall, I have zero problem with management kicking them out. That’s their right.

I don’t think that this is degrading to women or that kink is harmful or whatever. BUT. This isn’t entirely consensual kink.

Ok, look. It might consensual for the woman here. But it is NON consensual for the general public.

As a kinky person who’s been on precisely that end of a collar and leash, fuck off. That’s rude. Don’t do that in public. It may be consensual on her part, but this is not any different structurally than some dude jerking off on the subway—they’re getting off on the presence of innocent bystanders who have NOT…