“If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor.”

lmao thiiiiis guy!

That can’t be right. Plenty of people do this. They are taking issue this one time because they don’t like what their brad is associated with in this case, not because they are against the practice in general. 

You’ve got to be trolling. 

This is the internet in 2019, every article published on the internet in 2019 is clickbait according to someone. 

Some people just want to watch the world burn.

Right, but I do not believe it to be a reason, only an excuse. 

It depends on what you define as mental health. I suppose a definition of mental health can incorporate the kind of thing I’m talking about.

I do not stigmatize mental health because mental health has nothing to do with it. Yes it is true that many abusive people were abused themselves. But not all people who were abused become abusive. There is a correlation is not causation thing at play here. And statistically, there is not even a correlation between…

Sorry what follows is long and I am short on time so no time to edit, I bolded the important things for me if you don’t want to read all that.

Mental health is the common excuse of abusive people these days. Getting harder to justify it using the old methods, and it’s easy to get people to feel sorry for you that way. Truth is, there’s no statistical correlation. That is, abusive people are no more likely to have mental disorders than non-abusive people.…

I think you are becoming more of an a-hole yes. I am all for taking personal responsibility of our lives and working hard to achieve the life we want to live, and not waiting around for others just just give us things because that’s not how it works, and I am concerned about the victim mentality that many people adopt…

Where were you vilified for buying from amazon? Or is it your own guilty conscience that vilifies you when they report on it?

Please point to me where the article said it hated amazon. Please point to me where it says that they themselves are boycotting. Please point where it tells us we should boycott. Then I will see your point. 

This! lmao 

Kotaku is not a hive mind. Kotaku writers have been known to disagree and even criticize each other’s takes. And it isn’t clear to me that the author is criticizing the concept as a whole. It seems more like he’s highlighting some recent examples of when the pop off thing has gotten out of hand in a recent tournament. 

I think that has more to do with how you read it. I didn’t get any of that. I got exactly what the headline said, that they laid off employees. I think that maybe because of who wrote the post, people already expect something scandalous. Maybe because I didn’t see the author so I had no expectations going in about…

I think we should still be concerned, while recognizing it isn’t exclusive to amazon. Just because something is normal doesn’t mean it’s not concerning. 

That does not change the fact that they are being laid off. There are 0 takes in this article. It’s just a report on factual information. But people are still upset lol. 

You guys are getting really ridiculous with this clickbait thing. Back in the days, clickbait was something like this: “You won’t believe the reason why amazon just fired dozens of game developers.”