If there isn’t a word for something, you don’t just get to use a word for something else to mean the same thing just to fit into an arbitrary dichotomy.

I’m doing my best T_T

You’ve repeatedly referred to killing people for posing a threat to other people. That’s not self-defense, you fucking idiot. It’s unjust retribution.

Whoa, you are way too stupid, asshole. Perhaps if you were smarter, you could get something out of this conversation.

Why would I refer to that?

How do you not get that if there are three comments in reply to three previous comments and you know which comments two of them were in reply to, that means you should know which comment the third was in reply to?

Yes, you have explained why, in a completely different situation, there is inherent risk. You haven’t even explained why, in that situation, the drivers on the road shouldn’t try to avoid hitting you and should instead actively try to run you over, which would be analogous to the actual situation we’re talking about.

If you get in a fight, you can absolutely complain about someone punching you in the face. Hell, you can go to jail over it!

Yes, but that doesn’t answer the question, stupid. Answer the question.

I’ve explained this. You run out into the highway, there is an inherent risk you will get hit by a car, right? Why? Because there are people around with cars, and they drive them very fact on the highway. We know this. Actually I think there is a built in risk in everything we do. Life itself is a risk. I risk death…

Why is it okay for you to choose to end the life of another person without their consent but wrong for someone else to do the same?

Then are you just wasting my time on purpose?

That the risk of loss of life (which is what we’re talking about, not simply violence) will be returned is not an inherent risk, you dumb loon. It only exists if someone like you who is willing to risk someone else’s life is around.

If the value of people’s lives plays no role in your willingness to kill, you are, as I keep pointing out, extremely dangerous. People’s lives have value and it’s not up to you to take it from anyone.

If all people’s lives are of equal worth, why did you say that the idea that perceived aggressors’ lives are worth the same as perceived victims’ lives is “laughable”?

The meaning of inherent, the word I think you’re taking issue with, is something I am very familiar with. A lot of the work I do in my own philosophical work is centered around this word. Inherent, other words might be substituted: necessary, essential, natural, innate, intrinsic, immanent, a priori, etc. To be…

Then why are you still here? 

No, you haven’t explained this to me. Explain why some people’s lives are worth more than others. Explain which metrics you can use to determine a life’s worth.

No, stupid. That’s not an inherent risk. You do not know what words mean.

I’ve lost interest in this conversation and it makes it harder for me to remember what we were talking about lol so I don’t remember what you were wrong about anymore. It was something very specific though. I know that.